Accoring to politifact.com: "McCain has aired many, many ads that were not negative. If you look at a report from the same organization on Sept. 17, they found that in the week after the conventions, for example, Obama aired a higher percentage of negative ads than did McCain (76 percent to 56 percent)."
In all, the Wisconsin Advertising Project has found that 73 percent of McCain’s ads have been negative, to date. That's far short of 100 percent. (It also found 61 percent of Obama’s ads have been negative.)
So Obama might be right for one week, but he is way off for the overall campaign, when McCain's negative ads accounted for 73 percent. That's so far off that we find it Pants on Fire wrong."
Note: I suggest that McCain would not have felt it necessary to air so many "negative" ads had the media done its job properly. But since the media refused to bring certain issues to the attention of voters, it was McCain's DUTY to do so. Case in point: "Troopergate" got so much attention from the media, the Obama campaign didn't have to pay much attention to it. Meanwhile, while the media is so concerned with "Troopergate," they completely ignore a PLETHORA of far more serious issues which swirl around the Messiah and his candidacy.
Listen people . . . I will be offline until Sunday afternoon. You guys have a GREAT WEEKEND, pray for our great country, and . . .
TO HELL WITH THE WHALES! SAVE THE BABIES!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment