OBAMA ENDORSEMENTS

Please join ACORN, Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Palestinian People, Moammar Gadaffi, Al Qaeda, the Taliban, the hopelessly uninformed, and dictators and terrorists alike around the world in supporting Barack Husein Obama for President of the United States!

Oh, and I just COULDN'T pass this one up . . . did ya hear Joe Biden's latest gaffe? This is worse than Dan Quayle's "potatoe" gaffe . . . but since Biden is a liberal democrat, I am sure that most people never even heard this. Check it out. Joe Biden said this yesterday . . .

“Look, John’s last-minute economic plan does nothing to tackle the number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S,”

If SARAH PALIN had said that J-O-B-S was a three letter word, that is all you would see on t.v. all day and all night for a month. But how much attention have YOU seen brought to it? That's what I thought. Pathetic.

Obama given "pants on fire" rating on www.politifact.com

Barack Obama couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. In debate #3 Wednesday night he insisted that 100% of McCain's ads were negative. Perhaps he forgot the ad McCain ran on the night Obama accepted his party's nomination where McCain said "tomorrow, we'll be back at it, but tonight Senator, job well done." ANYBODY knows that Obama is lying through his teeth. Well, anyone except the idiots that believe ANYTHING he says, you know since he's "the Messiah" and all. I guess it makes sense that Messiahs don't lie.

Accoring to politifact.com: "McCain has aired many, many ads that were not negative. If you look at a report from the same organization on Sept. 17, they found that in the week after the conventions, for example, Obama aired a higher percentage of negative ads than did McCain (76 percent to 56 percent)."

In all, the Wisconsin Advertising Project has found that 73 percent of McCain’s ads have been negative, to date. That's far short of 100 percent. (It also found 61 percent of Obama’s ads have been negative.)

So Obama might be right for one week, but he is way off for the overall campaign, when McCain's negative ads accounted for 73 percent. That's so far off that we find it Pants on Fire wrong."

Note: I suggest that McCain would not have felt it necessary to air so many "negative" ads had the media done its job properly. But since the media refused to bring certain issues to the attention of voters, it was McCain's DUTY to do so. Case in point: "Troopergate" got so much attention from the media, the Obama campaign didn't have to pay much attention to it. Meanwhile, while the media is so concerned with "Troopergate," they completely ignore a PLETHORA of far more serious issues which swirl around the Messiah and his candidacy.

Listen people . . . I will be offline until Sunday afternoon. You guys have a GREAT WEEKEND, pray for our great country, and . . .

TO HELL WITH THE WHALES! SAVE THE BABIES!!!