Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Al-QAEDA READY TO STRIKE, WATCHING US ELECTION

I got this from www.foxnews.com (I'm such a plagiaristic copyright infringer!)
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/10/21/jmoody_1021/

"My colleague Catherine Herridge reported today something that shouldn’t have surprised me, but in fact did. And my surprise quickly turned to concern: Catherine reported on some online chatter from Islamic Web sites that has been intercepted and translated. Their conclusion: Al Qaeda is avidly following the US presidential race with an eye to its next attack.

The intelligence officials with whom Catherine talked told her that no matter which candidate becomes our 44th president, he will be dealing with an unrelenting desire by Al Qaeda to strike the US, as it did in 2001. One of its communiqués says the following about the coming month: “At that time the collapse will happen quickly and … then after the blow by Al Qaeda, God Willing, the United States will begin to disintegrate.”

The terrorists watching us from afar don’t get to vote, and they’ll keep trying to hit us no matter who’s in the White House. That doesn’t surprise me. But that doesn’t mean they don’t have their preferences. And knowing that is what concerns me."

Gee, wonder what their preference is? Hmmmm . . . a seasoned Republican war hero that they KNOW will come and hunt them down? Or an inexperienced radical liberal with poor judgment, who DOES have a muslim name(whether or not he is muslim himself), and whose father is from Kenya. Yeah, tough choice, huh?

And don't forget, in Obama's latest book . . .he DID SAY that if the political winds turned ugly, "I WILL SIDE WITH THEM." You have been warned.



If you can't understand this, you're probably an Obama supporter

A friend e-mailed this to me today, so I thought I would share it with you, my faithful disciples!

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all
ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it
would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the
arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

'Since you are all such good customers,' he said, 'I'm going to reduce
the cost of your daily beer by $20.' Drinks for the ten now cost just
$80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so
the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But
what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide
the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would
each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested
that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same
amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four
continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to
compare their savings.

'I only got a dollar out of the $20 declared the sixth man. He pointed
to the tenth man, 'but he got $10!'

'Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar,
too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!'

'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back
when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!'

'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night the
tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers
without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered
something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them
for even half of the bill!

And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is
how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the
most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for
being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they
might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

What is Joe Biden thinkin'? LMAO

Ya know, God love him . . . I guess he just can't help himself. Things are going great for the Obama-Biden campaign and for some reason Joe's Tourette's kicked in and out came a bombshell. Sure, I have been TELLING you people from day one that an Obama presidency would mean terrorists and rogue dictators would start acting like second graders with a substitute teacher. But I am glad you heard it from Joe. That gives it more credibility.

If McCain wins, there won't be any "international crisis" because the world knows John McCain, knows he is experienced, a war hero, and isn't going to let Iran, Russia, North Korea, or Venezuela get away with anything. THIS, my friends, is why "the world" wants Obama to be our next President: so we will be easier to knock off the top of the mountain.

Why would you WANT to promote an international crisis, and possibly WWIII by suporting an unproven inexperienced liberal candidate that has shown such bad judgment anyway? Do you just WANT to see thousands of soldiers killed? Obama criticized the money we spend in Iraq, but how is an ADDITIONAL ten billion a month going to sound after this new "international crisis" comes about?

Do we WANT another war? Can we afford one? The United States military is only equipped to handle three conflicts at once and we are already involved in two. If a third pops up SOLELY because we insisted on taking Louis Farrakhan's advice and electing "the Messiah," what would happen if a fourth conflict arose?

Consider this: we are already understaffed in Afghanistan, waiting for troops to withdraw from Iraq to be sent there. What if Iran sends a missile across to Israel in January? We might have to give up on Afghanistan altogether to go to war with Iran! And a war with Iran, if Israel is involved, likely would involve the entire Middle East(WWIII). Our military would be tapped out. That would completely open the door for Russia, who has shown a recent distaste for the U.S. and an appetite to invade it's neighbors . . . to walk back into Georgia and the Ukraine, and no telling where else, basically UNCHALLENGED because we would have our hands full with Iran. Is that what we want? And to think that it all could have been avoided by not electing a president that was barely potty trained, because he had such great "rhetorical abilities." That is nonsense. The blood of our soldiers is precious. If we know NOW that a conflict is on the horizon, and the conflict will arise SOLELY because the world knows Obama will be soft, inexperienced, and unable to handle the job . . . then why wouldn't we SAVE those thousands of soldiers now and elect a man who can step in on day one . . . a man who Russia, Iran, North Korea, and others will KNOW BETTER than to tempt?

If ya wanna know who SHOULD be the next President, ask yourself this: who does Iran, Russia, Venezuela, and North Korea want to be President . . . and then ask yourself WHY. But you have been warned. I warned you, your own common sense HAS to have warned you, and now JOE BIDEN has warned you.

Oh, almost forgot . . . do we really NEED another international crisis with our economy ailing the way it is? Shouldn't we be focusing on fixing things here instead of being strung out all over the world putting out fires because terrorists and dictators are having a field day with our poor judgment?

COLIN POWELL and WMD's

George Bush is criticized for, among other things, going into Iraq under false pretenses. Hmmmmmm . . . . let the record reflect that it was Colin Powell assured President Bush that Iraq had WMD's . . . and now Powell is siding with Obama? Why doesn't Colin go ahead and come clean, be a MAN, and take responsibility for misrepresenting the WMD's in Iraq? Just wondering.

Obama found to have long-term association with Satan!

Yesterday it was discovered that Barack Husein Obama has had a life long friendship with Satan. When asked about the association, Obama remarked: "Look, I wasn't even born yet when Satan committed his dispicable acts, attempting to overthrow the Kingdom of God. I have rejected these acts as unacceptable. I helped promote his book, our kids went to school together, we live in the same neighborhood, we worked on numerous projects together, he hosted a party for me at my house . . . I mean he's just a guy who lives in my neighborhood. I don't see the big deal. Can't we just talk about the economy???"