I very nearly dragged myself out of bed this morning at around 3am to get online and type this. I was incensed! I was drifting off to sleep, listening to the Michael Medved show, and the topic was George Obama, Barack Obama's half-brother who lives in Kenya in the slums on $1 a month. First, Michael Medved IS a conservative talk show host, but unlike most of the liberal talk show hosts, he DOES allow, and actually INVITES those with opposing views to call in. So there I am, lying in bed, and this guy calls in and says something to this effect(paraphrasing):
"I have two questions for you. What does this(George Obama) have to do with Obama running for President, and IS THAT ALL YA GOT?"
It has been quite a while since I remember being so utterly shocked. I didn't know whether to bite my tongue in half or laugh myself to sleep. As I outlined in another post this morning entitled "I am my brother's keeper," if Obama didn't want to help his brother, that is one thing, although I think it is deplorable on a moral level. He makes $4 Million a year and sending $200 would have made his brother RICH by Kenyan standards, but he did NOTHING. The big problem is that Obama SAYS "I am my brother's keeper," to make YOU feel good, to make YOU believe that he is going to "take care" of you. Obama DOES want to take care of you . . . 1)to get your vote, and 2)with someone else's money. When it comes to HIS MONEY, he ain't doin' shit! Not even to his OWN BROTHER! So Barack, keep your damn mouth shut. You aren't ANYBODY'S keeper, period.
But I digress. So now we move on to "is that all ya got?" Is that all ya got? Now that's funny! Here's a guy who is up at 3am to listen to conservative talk show hosts, wanting to fight with someone . . . but doesn't care enough to actually BE informed about the candidate he professes to be so in love with. Is that all ya got? Really? Here's a mini-list of things "we got:"
1)He's inexperienced (140 days in the Senate before running for Pres.)
2)He has VERY bad judgment (too numerous to mention, read entire blog)
3)He's dishonest (too numerous to mention, read entire blog)
4)William Ayers (unrepentant terrorist who helped Obama kick off Senate campaign
5)Tony Rezko(Syrian, convicted of extortion, bribery, fraud . . . Obama's "money guy" SURPRISE!) What a coincidence that Obama and Rezko bought adjacent parcels on the SAME DAY! Small world, huh? Yeah, no corruption there!
6)Rev. Wright "God Damn America" "chickens coming home to roost" (visited Libya and met with Gadaffi, gave Farrakhan "lifetime achievement award")
7)Rev. Phleger (racist/sexist/radical who Obama helped secure MILLION$ for)
8)ACORN (promoted voter fraud as a "community organizer")
9)Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac (#2 recipient since 1989 of donations, has TWO ex-execs on staff)
10)His wife said she is proud of her country for "the first time" in 2008
11)Voted "present" 130 times in State Senate
12)Voted 4 times AGAINST providing medical care to babies born alive after botched abortions
13)He is the Flip-flop KING. Too numerous to mention. Read entire blog and quit delegating YOUR duties to Tom Brokaw and NBC.
14)Obame is the EARMARK KING! McCain ZERO earmarks . . .Obama nearly $1 Million per day.
15)Thinks Iran is a "tiny threat"
16)Initially blamed Georgia when Rissia invaded, then suggested a UN resolution, apparently not realizing RUSSIA HAS VETO POWER IN THE UN! DUH!
17)How many more do you need?
Okay, now you've got me started . . . here's a guy who is IN THE TANK for Obama, calling ocnservative talk shows at 3am on a Monday morning looking for a fight, but couldn't be less informed. "Is that all ya got?" This should be EXHIBIT ONE of how the media has not done it's job. We have a man running for PRESIDENT for the past TWENTY MONTHS, and there are Obama supporters out there saying "is that all ya got?" That shows the media has not done it's job. Sarah Palin has been running for VICE PRESIDENT for one month and who HASN'T heard about her daughter being pregnant? Who hasn't heard about "she was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it?"
EXPERIENCE. I see it time and again. Obama supporters cannot point to ANY SPECIFIC accomplishments that qualify Obama to be President . . . but these same people want to tear Sarah Palin and her family apart, because she would be "a heartbeat away from the presidency." Well Obama would not be a HEARTBEAT AWAY, he would BE the President. Thinking about voting for Obama? Ask yourself one question: Has this man EVER done ANYTHING to suggest he is ready to lead the greatest nation on Earth except GIVE A GOOD SPEECH written by someone else?
Monday, September 29, 2008
"I am my brother's keeper" Reason #981
Barack Obama, wanting you and everyone else to believe that A)he cares about YOU, and B)he is going to take care of you like a good president should, used the words "I am my brother's keeper."
One problem. He has a half-brother named George Obama, who lives in a slum in Nairobi, Kenya on $12 a year. What does that matter? Glad you asked. If Obama had said NOTHING, this wouldn't be that big a deal. By the way, Obama made $4 Million last year. The man that wants YOU to believe that "he is his brother's keeper," is anything but his brother's keeper. Did he send his own brother 10 cents to help him better himself? No. One cent? No. Obama DOES want to take money from YOU to help OTHERS, he's just not interested in taking any of his OWN MONEY OUT OF HIS OWN POCKET and helping his own flesh and blood, his own brother!
read: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/22/bts.obama.brother/
While I'm on the subject, Obama and Biden are nothing short of complete hypocrites. The want to be giving, help those in need, with YOUR MONEY. But what do these fat cats do with their OWN MONEY? Glad you asked. Joe Biden, who has been a US Senator since Richard Nixon was in office, has given an AVERAGE of $369/year for the past decade to charity. That is pathetic. But this is the SAME MAN who said in a nationally televised interview earlier this month that it was TIME TO RAISE TAXES, and his justification was, it's "time to be patriotic." Once again, Joe Biden wants to be charitable with YOUR MONEY, but has NO INTEREST in doing so with HIS.
read:http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-12-biden-financial_N.htm
And the SADDEST thing about all of this is, you don't see/hear/read this stuff because the overwhelming coverage in the media is nothing but Obama, Obama, Obama, blah blah blah . . . a bunch of garbage you are being FORCE FED. If you CARE about this country, read up, bone up, be informed, and stop the insanity!
One problem. He has a half-brother named George Obama, who lives in a slum in Nairobi, Kenya on $12 a year. What does that matter? Glad you asked. If Obama had said NOTHING, this wouldn't be that big a deal. By the way, Obama made $4 Million last year. The man that wants YOU to believe that "he is his brother's keeper," is anything but his brother's keeper. Did he send his own brother 10 cents to help him better himself? No. One cent? No. Obama DOES want to take money from YOU to help OTHERS, he's just not interested in taking any of his OWN MONEY OUT OF HIS OWN POCKET and helping his own flesh and blood, his own brother!
read: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/22/bts.obama.brother/
While I'm on the subject, Obama and Biden are nothing short of complete hypocrites. The want to be giving, help those in need, with YOUR MONEY. But what do these fat cats do with their OWN MONEY? Glad you asked. Joe Biden, who has been a US Senator since Richard Nixon was in office, has given an AVERAGE of $369/year for the past decade to charity. That is pathetic. But this is the SAME MAN who said in a nationally televised interview earlier this month that it was TIME TO RAISE TAXES, and his justification was, it's "time to be patriotic." Once again, Joe Biden wants to be charitable with YOUR MONEY, but has NO INTEREST in doing so with HIS.
read:http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-09-12-biden-financial_N.htm
And the SADDEST thing about all of this is, you don't see/hear/read this stuff because the overwhelming coverage in the media is nothing but Obama, Obama, Obama, blah blah blah . . . a bunch of garbage you are being FORCE FED. If you CARE about this country, read up, bone up, be informed, and stop the insanity!
The Garden of Eden(Satan for President)
The story is thousands of years old . . . and whether it actually HAPPENED or not is immaterial. You DO believe in good and evil, don't you? Remember the story of Adam and Eve? The fall of mankind began with a snake who, being a SMOOTH TALKER, convinced Eve to do the one thing that God warned her against . . . eat the apple. And then she got Adam to take a bite and the rest is history. So the next time you allow yourself to THINK that Obama should be president on the basis of being such a "good talker," think about Eve in the garden, being romanced by a snake . . .
Sunday, September 28, 2008
An e-mail to the Obama campaign
I sent an e-mail to the Obama campaign today, and here is how it reads, verbatim:
"A friend and I were having a discussion, and he told me that if I asked the following questions, they would NEVER be answered, and that I would be ignored. I hope he is wrong.
1)Why shouldn't Sen. Obama's association with two radical preachers, Wright and Phleger reflect on Sen. Obama's judgment? Especially considering That Rev. Wright visited Gadaffi in Libya and gave Rev. Farrakan a "lifetime achievement award."
2)Why shouldn't the fact that Sen. Obama's own wife admit that she is just now "proud of America" reflect on who he really is?
3)Why shouldn't Sen. Obama's ties with Tony Rezko, a Syrian who is now a convicted felon, including the land deal that took place, reflect on Sen. Obama's integrity?
4)Why is Sen. Obama qualified to lead this country given that he was only in the US Senate 130 days prior to runing for President and voted "present" 130 times in the Illinois State Senate?
5)Why shouldn't Sen. Obama's affiliation with ACORN, an association KNOWN for perpetrating voter fraud across this country, reflect on his character?
6)Why shouldn't Sen. Obama's remarks regarding his relationship with William Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist who he pretended to not know very well, reflect on his integrity?
7)What was Sen. Obama's ACTUAL relationship with William Ayers aside from the fact that his Senatorial campaign was kicked off at Ayers' house and sitting on a board with Ayers?
8)What are Sen. Obama's thoughts on Saul Alinsky?
My friend says this e-mail will be ignored. Will it?"
Anybody wanna lay odds that this e-mail will EVER be answered? Not a chance in hell! But I am going to stay on them until they DO ANSWER IT! Cut and paste the above and e-mail it yourself . . .
"A friend and I were having a discussion, and he told me that if I asked the following questions, they would NEVER be answered, and that I would be ignored. I hope he is wrong.
1)Why shouldn't Sen. Obama's association with two radical preachers, Wright and Phleger reflect on Sen. Obama's judgment? Especially considering That Rev. Wright visited Gadaffi in Libya and gave Rev. Farrakan a "lifetime achievement award."
2)Why shouldn't the fact that Sen. Obama's own wife admit that she is just now "proud of America" reflect on who he really is?
3)Why shouldn't Sen. Obama's ties with Tony Rezko, a Syrian who is now a convicted felon, including the land deal that took place, reflect on Sen. Obama's integrity?
4)Why is Sen. Obama qualified to lead this country given that he was only in the US Senate 130 days prior to runing for President and voted "present" 130 times in the Illinois State Senate?
5)Why shouldn't Sen. Obama's affiliation with ACORN, an association KNOWN for perpetrating voter fraud across this country, reflect on his character?
6)Why shouldn't Sen. Obama's remarks regarding his relationship with William Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist who he pretended to not know very well, reflect on his integrity?
7)What was Sen. Obama's ACTUAL relationship with William Ayers aside from the fact that his Senatorial campaign was kicked off at Ayers' house and sitting on a board with Ayers?
8)What are Sen. Obama's thoughts on Saul Alinsky?
My friend says this e-mail will be ignored. Will it?"
Anybody wanna lay odds that this e-mail will EVER be answered? Not a chance in hell! But I am going to stay on them until they DO ANSWER IT! Cut and paste the above and e-mail it yourself . . .
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Obama's "base"
I was only recently reminded why it is that Obama even has a CHANCE in November.
Democrats want to BUY your vote with "goodies." He gets the black vote because he's black. Which brings up an incredible double standard. I hear that over 80% of the blacks are voting for Obama. Isn't that racism? Last week I saw blacks complaining because 25% of white democrats wouldn't vote for Obama because he is black. Let's just ASSUME that it is true. If only 25% of whites are racist, then isn't that far better than the 80% plus on the black side? But I digress again.
Then he wants to get all other "have nots", promise them something . . . education(which is the STATE'S responsibility), health care, whatever it takes to get their vote.
And then there's the BUREAUCRATS. The social workers . . . that see a raise, a promotion, a bigger BUDGET, more money for THEM . . . nobody cares where the money has to come from. And then after he has amassed the "black vote," the "have nots" vote, and the "bureaucrat vote," he then appeals to the "idiot contingent," and relies on networks like NBC to overlook his faults and help him fabricate his patheticly grandiose identity so that, with a big enough slice of the "idiot contingent," he can get elected . . .and then take the money from the people who actually WORK to make this country work . . . (unlike government workers who spend more time on crossword puzzles than work) . . . and give it to the voters who blessed him with the privilege of running the country into the ground.
"Social worker." Please. I don't have a "social worker." Is that another term for "government appointed babysitter?"
Democrats want to BUY your vote with "goodies." He gets the black vote because he's black. Which brings up an incredible double standard. I hear that over 80% of the blacks are voting for Obama. Isn't that racism? Last week I saw blacks complaining because 25% of white democrats wouldn't vote for Obama because he is black. Let's just ASSUME that it is true. If only 25% of whites are racist, then isn't that far better than the 80% plus on the black side? But I digress again.
Then he wants to get all other "have nots", promise them something . . . education(which is the STATE'S responsibility), health care, whatever it takes to get their vote.
And then there's the BUREAUCRATS. The social workers . . . that see a raise, a promotion, a bigger BUDGET, more money for THEM . . . nobody cares where the money has to come from. And then after he has amassed the "black vote," the "have nots" vote, and the "bureaucrat vote," he then appeals to the "idiot contingent," and relies on networks like NBC to overlook his faults and help him fabricate his patheticly grandiose identity so that, with a big enough slice of the "idiot contingent," he can get elected . . .and then take the money from the people who actually WORK to make this country work . . . (unlike government workers who spend more time on crossword puzzles than work) . . . and give it to the voters who blessed him with the privilege of running the country into the ground.
"Social worker." Please. I don't have a "social worker." Is that another term for "government appointed babysitter?"
Reason Number 867
Acting CONSISTENT with his "Country First" campaign theme, John McCain yesterday announced he was suspending his campaign to return to Washington and FIX the Wall Street mortgage crisis. He further wanted to postpone the debate Friday night in Mississippi. Of course I believe McCain will attend the debate, AND kick Obama's ass . . . but I digress. Obama didn't want to return to Washington HIMSELF to help fix the problem. Oh, no! He would PREFER to travel the country bashing McCain and Bush for the problem.
Tonight on television I heard Obama say something to the effect that he thought McCain shouldn't be in Washington getting in the middle of the situation. NEWSFLASH: Both candidates are US SENATORS . . . it's their damn job!!!! But Obama has shown his true colors.
1)He doesn't want McCain "interjecting presidential politics" into the current Wall Street collapse, but he sure doesn't mind spending all day every day traveling the country and blaming McCain for the situation. Think about it . . . if it IS McCain's fault, then SHOULDN'T HE BE IN WASHINGTON FIXING IT? HELLO! Why doesn't Obama want McCain DOING HIS JOB? because then AMERICA WILL SEE . . . it is John McCain that has, for 26 years now, crossed the aisle to reach compromise, confronting his own party when necessary, for the good of the country. Obama doesn't want that. The worse things are, the more people will vote for Obama the fraud.
2)Obama told Congressman and Senators in Washington, "if you need me, call me." He KNOWS he is a talker, not a doer. McCain is a doer, and Obama doesn't want McCain in WASHINGTON fixing the problem, and if there is a solution(which there will be), he doesn't want McCain to get the credit. Then Obama's speech writers will have to think up some new line of attacks and put their speeches on his teleprompter so he can "look" smart and fool all the idiots that don't want to take the time to think for themselves.
Finally, I am just about sick and tired of seeing Obama stand in front of a blue curtain with wall to wall American flags behind him. You know what he is doing, don't you? Subconsciously trying to get people to "see him" as President and show how utterly patriotic he is. He is anything but. Are Americans this dumb? Just standing up there, staring alternatively from left to right, like some damn robot, squinting his eyes as if he is deep in thought . . . please. Next time you see him speak, watch how he looks down(to read what somebody TOLD HIM TO SAY), then lookt to the left, then looks down, then looks to the right, look at his hokey body language. God he is so fake.
A) if he was so patriotic, why did he even ASSOCIATE with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his good friend and pastor, when he heard him say that 9/11 was our fault, "the chickens are coming home to roost," and "God Damned America!"
B)if he was so patriotic, why did his own WIFE reveal this spring that "until now" she has never been proud of her country. And even then, she admits, it's only because her husband "is doing so well." What she is REALLY SAYING is that 1)she is proud of Barack, not America, and 2)she is proud as long as people want what SHE wants.
Barack will go away on November 4 and we won't have to worry about this crap anymore. Hell, after learning so much about Obama, I would WELCOME a Hillary Clnton presidency, and I am being SERIOUS!
Tonight on television I heard Obama say something to the effect that he thought McCain shouldn't be in Washington getting in the middle of the situation. NEWSFLASH: Both candidates are US SENATORS . . . it's their damn job!!!! But Obama has shown his true colors.
1)He doesn't want McCain "interjecting presidential politics" into the current Wall Street collapse, but he sure doesn't mind spending all day every day traveling the country and blaming McCain for the situation. Think about it . . . if it IS McCain's fault, then SHOULDN'T HE BE IN WASHINGTON FIXING IT? HELLO! Why doesn't Obama want McCain DOING HIS JOB? because then AMERICA WILL SEE . . . it is John McCain that has, for 26 years now, crossed the aisle to reach compromise, confronting his own party when necessary, for the good of the country. Obama doesn't want that. The worse things are, the more people will vote for Obama the fraud.
2)Obama told Congressman and Senators in Washington, "if you need me, call me." He KNOWS he is a talker, not a doer. McCain is a doer, and Obama doesn't want McCain in WASHINGTON fixing the problem, and if there is a solution(which there will be), he doesn't want McCain to get the credit. Then Obama's speech writers will have to think up some new line of attacks and put their speeches on his teleprompter so he can "look" smart and fool all the idiots that don't want to take the time to think for themselves.
Finally, I am just about sick and tired of seeing Obama stand in front of a blue curtain with wall to wall American flags behind him. You know what he is doing, don't you? Subconsciously trying to get people to "see him" as President and show how utterly patriotic he is. He is anything but. Are Americans this dumb? Just standing up there, staring alternatively from left to right, like some damn robot, squinting his eyes as if he is deep in thought . . . please. Next time you see him speak, watch how he looks down(to read what somebody TOLD HIM TO SAY), then lookt to the left, then looks down, then looks to the right, look at his hokey body language. God he is so fake.
A) if he was so patriotic, why did he even ASSOCIATE with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his good friend and pastor, when he heard him say that 9/11 was our fault, "the chickens are coming home to roost," and "God Damned America!"
B)if he was so patriotic, why did his own WIFE reveal this spring that "until now" she has never been proud of her country. And even then, she admits, it's only because her husband "is doing so well." What she is REALLY SAYING is that 1)she is proud of Barack, not America, and 2)she is proud as long as people want what SHE wants.
Barack will go away on November 4 and we won't have to worry about this crap anymore. Hell, after learning so much about Obama, I would WELCOME a Hillary Clnton presidency, and I am being SERIOUS!
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Voting "present"
What a JOKE. Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate to MAKE DECISIONS, not just show up, sit in his chair, and vote "present." The PRESIDENT has to make decisions. he can't just say "I'm here."
Senator Obama, in the Illinois State Senate, voted "present" 130 times. Why? Because he valued his POLITICAL CAREER above the work he was elected to do. he didn't want to take a stand on controversial bills because then he would be attacked, no matter which way he voted. So he voted "present."
Yeah, that's what I call "ready to lead."
Read: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/feb/13/obamas-present-tension/
If you can't MAKE A DECISION 130 times in the State Senate, how can you be ready to be the President of the United States where you cannot be just "present" one time. You have to decide. Obama is a joke.
Senator Obama, in the Illinois State Senate, voted "present" 130 times. Why? Because he valued his POLITICAL CAREER above the work he was elected to do. he didn't want to take a stand on controversial bills because then he would be attacked, no matter which way he voted. So he voted "present."
Yeah, that's what I call "ready to lead."
Read: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/feb/13/obamas-present-tension/
If you can't MAKE A DECISION 130 times in the State Senate, how can you be ready to be the President of the United States where you cannot be just "present" one time. You have to decide. Obama is a joke.
Are you a baby killer?
Well, no matter your position on ANY other issue, if you help to elect a man who you KNOW has voted FOUR TIMES AGAINST a bill in the Illinois State Senate that would provide health care to babies BORN ALIVE due to a botched abortion, then YOU have to live with yourself for that, and yes, YOU have blood on your hands.
How important IS anything else when you respect a woman's right to choose to the point that even after the baby has LEFT HER BODY, and is living, human being, with a SOUL . . . that you respect the MOTHER'S RIGHT to have the baby killed by just throwing a live human being in a dumpster to die? What kind of sick, twisted world do we live in that, although important, education, health care, the economy, etc . . . take a front seat to such PRIMAL ISSUES?
For information on the FACTS, go to http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm
The site reads as follows:
How important IS anything else when you respect a woman's right to choose to the point that even after the baby has LEFT HER BODY, and is living, human being, with a SOUL . . . that you respect the MOTHER'S RIGHT to have the baby killed by just throwing a live human being in a dumpster to die? What kind of sick, twisted world do we live in that, although important, education, health care, the economy, etc . . . take a front seat to such PRIMAL ISSUES?
For information on the FACTS, go to http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm
The site reads as follows:
On Jan. 10, 2005, newly elected U.S. Sen. Barack Obama visited former colleagues and staffers at the Illinois state Capitol, where he had served seven years as state senator. I happened to be at the Capitol that day, too, and a friend and I took the opportunity to speak to Obama, who had not yet achieved rock-star status and was still approachable.
We were in Springfield to lobby for passage of the state Born Alive Infant Protection Act, legislation that would require hospitals to care for infants who survive an abortion. Obama spoke against the legislation in 2001 and 2002 and single-handedly defeated it in committee in 2003.
My friend stood in Obama’s path and said, “Senator, we are going to pass Born Alive here in Illinois this year.”
Obama smiled smoothly and agreed, “I think you will,” adding, “I would have voted for the Born Alive Infant Protection Act in Illinois had it been worded the same as the federal bill. I think that’s the position the Democrats should take.”
There’s just one thing he forgot to mention: Obama had stopped his committee from adding the federal wording.
With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.
Saturday, September 20, 2008
ACORN
Jesus! How many reasons do you need to realize that this is the most liberal, radical candidate to EVER run for office in this country?
If you don’t know what ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) is all about, you better bone up. This left-wing group takes in 40 percent of its revenues from American taxpayers — you and me — and has leveraged nearly four decades of government subsidies to fund affiliates that promote the welfare state and undermine capitalism and self-reliance, some of which have been implicated in perpetuating illegal immigration and encouraging voter fraud. A new whistleblower report from the Consumer Rights League documents how Chicago-based ACORN has commingled public tax dollars with political projects.
If you don’t know what ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) is all about, you better bone up. This left-wing group takes in 40 percent of its revenues from American taxpayers — you and me — and has leveraged nearly four decades of government subsidies to fund affiliates that promote the welfare state and undermine capitalism and self-reliance, some of which have been implicated in perpetuating illegal immigration and encouraging voter fraud. A new whistleblower report from the Consumer Rights League documents how Chicago-based ACORN has commingled public tax dollars with political projects.
Who in Washington will fight to ensure that your money isn’t being spent on these radical activities?
Don’t bother asking Barack Obama. He cut his ideological teeth working with ACORN as a “community organizer” and legal representative. Naturally, ACORN’s political action committee has warmly endorsed his presidential candidacy. According to ACORN, Obama trained its Chicago members in leadership seminars; in turn, ACORN volunteers worked on his campaigns. Obama also sat on the boards of the Woods Fund and Joyce Foundation, both of which poured money into ACORN’s coffers. ACORN head Maude Hurd gushes that Obama is the candidate who “best understands and can affect change on the issues ACORN cares about” — like ensuring their massive pipeline to your hard-earned money.
Let’s take a closer look at the ACORN Obama knows.
Last July, ACORN settled the largest case of voter fraud in the history of Washington State. Seven ACORN workers had submitted nearly 2,000 bogus voter registration forms. According to case records, they flipped through phone books for names to use on the forms, including “Leon Spinks,” “Frekkie Magoal” and “Fruto Boy Crispila.” Three ACORN election hoaxers pleaded guilty in October. A King County prosecutor called ACORN’s criminal sabotage “an act of vandalism upon the voter rolls.”
The group’s vandalism on electoral integrity is systemic. ACORN has been implicated in similar voter fraud schemes in Missouri, Ohio and at least 12 other states. The Wall Street Journal noted: “In Ohio in 2004, a worker for one affiliate was given crack cocaine in exchange for fraudulent registrations that included underage voters, dead voters and pillars of the community named Mary Poppins, Dick Tracy and Jive Turkey. During a congressional hearing in Ohio in the aftermath of the 2004 election, officials from several counties in the state explained ACORN’s practice of dumping thousands of registration forms in their lap on the submission deadline, even though the forms had been collected months earlier.”
In March, Philadelphia elections officials accused the nonprofit advocacy group of filing fraudulent voter registrations in advance of the April 22nd Pennsylvania primary. The charges have been forwarded to the city district attorney’s office.
Under the guise of “consumer advocacy,” ACORN has lined its pockets. The Department of Housing and Urban Development funds hundreds, if not thousands, of left-wing “anti-poverty” groups across the country led by ACORN. Last October, HUD announced more than $44 million in new housing counseling grants to over 400 state and local efforts. The White House has increased funding for housing counseling by 150 percent since taking office in 2001, despite the role most of these recipients play as activist satellites of the Democratic Party. The AARP scored nearly $400,000 for training; the National Council of La Raza (”The Race”) scooped up more than $1.3 million; the National Urban League raked in nearly $1 million; and the ACORN Housing Corporation received more than $1.6 million.
As the Consumer Rights League points out in its new expose, the ACORN Housing Corporation has worked to obtain mortgages for illegal aliens in partnership with Citibank. It relies on undocumented income, “under the table” money, which may not be reported to the Internal Revenue Service. Moreover, the group’s “financial justice” operations attack lenders for “exotic” loans, while recommending 10-year interest-only loans (which deny equity to the buyer) and risky reverse mortgages. Whistleblower documents reveal internal discussions among the group that blur the lines between its tax-exempt housing work and its aggressive electioneering activities. The group appears to shake down corporate interests with relentless PR attacks, and then enters “no lobby” agreements with targeted corporations after receiving payment.
Republicans have largely looked the other way as ACORN has expanded its government-funded empire. But finally, a few conservative voices in Congress have called for investigation of the group’s apparent extortion schemes. This week, GOP Reps. Tom Feeney, Jeb Hensarling and Ed Royce called on Democrat Barney Frank, chair of the House Financial Services Committee, to convene a hearing to probe potential illegalities and abuse of taxpayer funds by ACORN’s management and minions alike.
Where does the candidate of Hope and Change — the candidate of Reform and New Politics — stand on the issue? Barack Obama, ACORN’s senator, is for more of the same old, same old subsidizing of far-left politics in the name of fighting for the poor while enriching ideological cronies. It’s the Chicago way.
Friday, September 19, 2008
OBAMA- blood on his hands(another fact the media chooses to completely ignore)
Can you BELIEVE this? If this were John McCain's economic advisor, you would see it on every paper, and on tv all day long . . . all night too.
Obama not only got more money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, more than ANY other current politician, and more than all but ONE all-time(and he's only been there three years by the way-can you say "freshman senator?") . . . anyway . . . his CHIEF ECONOMIC ADVISOR is the former CEO of Fannie Mae---Franklin Raines and ex-CEO of Lehman Brothers! How does driving two of america's largest financial institutions into the ground qualify you to advise the President? Did I mention he would be the most inexperienced President we have EVER had?
And yes, Sarah Palin's experience dwarfs that of "The Messiah." Doesn't the media OWE it to you to tell you things like this? I mean it is YOU who has to pick up the tab when these institutions go under, so why should the media be able to get away with turning their head the other way, and conveniently not telling you these things? The answer is two-fold, and rather simple.
1)Why does a dog lick his balls? Because he can. Americans are lazy, and believe whatever is fed to them, and the media knows that the masses are just going to swallow whatever they put out there. The media will start being HONEST with us when we demand it. As long as we value our "me time" more than keeping this country as great as it has always been, the media will continue to just fill your living room with lies for the five minutes a day you let them in before you rush off to American Idol and a bowl of popcorn.
2)The media has a vested interest in misery. Think about what makes people watch tv the most . . . ratings are quite high for the network news shows when there is a flood, a hurricane, tornados, earthquakes, tsunamis, plane crashes, murders, celebrity trials, etc... but the problem is, afte a few days ratings go back down. Ever notice that when a bad storm comes through town, instead of watching your favorite television show you get hour after hour of a weatherman standing in front of a map, saying the same old thing, over and over again? What happened to the scrolling warnings at the bottom of the screen? The local media picked up on the idea that SAYING things are going to be really bad, selling that fear all night long, makes their viewership go up, up, up. And tat is just sick. And ever notice that the storm is hardly EVER as bad as they pump it up to be? They NEVER measure up. And usually we have to watch hours of weather maps while we hear about how ONE FARMER lost a roof on a barn he doesn't use, almost 100 miles away. Quick! Get out there with the mobile news unit and get some pictures! Put a microphone in that man's face!!! They need a way to KEEP ratings up EVERY DAY. They know that if the value of the dollar is declining, the stock market is collapsing, unemployment and inflation rise, etc . . . that you will tune in every night to see today's gloom and doom report. There was no shortage of DAILY BAD NEWS in the Jimmy Carter era, and darned few slow news days under Bill "blowjob" Clinton. Notice how "gas prices" were the top story for months? The COVERAGE given to it seemed to make the prices rise, accepting it as a foregone conclusion. But how much coverage by comparison has the FALLING OIL PRICES received? Almost zero. Every day for over a month now, oil has fallen steadily. It now hovers around $90/barrel. It was over $140 45 days ago. Where's the media coverage? The media sells commercials, and the way to get you to watch is to sell YOU FEAR. And with Obama as President, they know they will have plenty of fear to sell you, every day, for four straight years. they won't NEED a natural disaster or a car bomb to report on. They can just merely report the daily catastrophes caused by a man they helped elect so he could destroy everything we have worked so hard to build, and devastate your children's dreams. Th emedia doesn't want good news, it thrive son bad. And if things are going GOOD in America, people are vacationing, shopping, having cookouts, going to the lake, and not watchign tv because they aren't worried. It is when things ar egoing bad that vacations are cancelled, belts are tightened, people go out less, and watch the nightly news for their daily dose of misery.
BREAK THE CYCLE AMERICA!
1)Watch FOX News to get FAIR AND BALANCED reporting
and
2)Don't elect Barack Obama unless you are addicted to misery. In that case, you may get a fatal overdose. How could we even CONSIDER electing a man with so little experience and so many questionable ties? It baffles me. But that's the MEDIA for ya! He should have NEVER beaten Hillary, but he did because the media loved him. And if the media wins, YOU LOSE. So make sure your television is in good working order, because if Barack is elected, you're going to need it!
Obama not only got more money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, more than ANY other current politician, and more than all but ONE all-time(and he's only been there three years by the way-can you say "freshman senator?") . . . anyway . . . his CHIEF ECONOMIC ADVISOR is the former CEO of Fannie Mae---Franklin Raines and ex-CEO of Lehman Brothers! How does driving two of america's largest financial institutions into the ground qualify you to advise the President? Did I mention he would be the most inexperienced President we have EVER had?
And yes, Sarah Palin's experience dwarfs that of "The Messiah." Doesn't the media OWE it to you to tell you things like this? I mean it is YOU who has to pick up the tab when these institutions go under, so why should the media be able to get away with turning their head the other way, and conveniently not telling you these things? The answer is two-fold, and rather simple.
1)Why does a dog lick his balls? Because he can. Americans are lazy, and believe whatever is fed to them, and the media knows that the masses are just going to swallow whatever they put out there. The media will start being HONEST with us when we demand it. As long as we value our "me time" more than keeping this country as great as it has always been, the media will continue to just fill your living room with lies for the five minutes a day you let them in before you rush off to American Idol and a bowl of popcorn.
2)The media has a vested interest in misery. Think about what makes people watch tv the most . . . ratings are quite high for the network news shows when there is a flood, a hurricane, tornados, earthquakes, tsunamis, plane crashes, murders, celebrity trials, etc... but the problem is, afte a few days ratings go back down. Ever notice that when a bad storm comes through town, instead of watching your favorite television show you get hour after hour of a weatherman standing in front of a map, saying the same old thing, over and over again? What happened to the scrolling warnings at the bottom of the screen? The local media picked up on the idea that SAYING things are going to be really bad, selling that fear all night long, makes their viewership go up, up, up. And tat is just sick. And ever notice that the storm is hardly EVER as bad as they pump it up to be? They NEVER measure up. And usually we have to watch hours of weather maps while we hear about how ONE FARMER lost a roof on a barn he doesn't use, almost 100 miles away. Quick! Get out there with the mobile news unit and get some pictures! Put a microphone in that man's face!!! They need a way to KEEP ratings up EVERY DAY. They know that if the value of the dollar is declining, the stock market is collapsing, unemployment and inflation rise, etc . . . that you will tune in every night to see today's gloom and doom report. There was no shortage of DAILY BAD NEWS in the Jimmy Carter era, and darned few slow news days under Bill "blowjob" Clinton. Notice how "gas prices" were the top story for months? The COVERAGE given to it seemed to make the prices rise, accepting it as a foregone conclusion. But how much coverage by comparison has the FALLING OIL PRICES received? Almost zero. Every day for over a month now, oil has fallen steadily. It now hovers around $90/barrel. It was over $140 45 days ago. Where's the media coverage? The media sells commercials, and the way to get you to watch is to sell YOU FEAR. And with Obama as President, they know they will have plenty of fear to sell you, every day, for four straight years. they won't NEED a natural disaster or a car bomb to report on. They can just merely report the daily catastrophes caused by a man they helped elect so he could destroy everything we have worked so hard to build, and devastate your children's dreams. Th emedia doesn't want good news, it thrive son bad. And if things are going GOOD in America, people are vacationing, shopping, having cookouts, going to the lake, and not watchign tv because they aren't worried. It is when things ar egoing bad that vacations are cancelled, belts are tightened, people go out less, and watch the nightly news for their daily dose of misery.
BREAK THE CYCLE AMERICA!
1)Watch FOX News to get FAIR AND BALANCED reporting
and
2)Don't elect Barack Obama unless you are addicted to misery. In that case, you may get a fatal overdose. How could we even CONSIDER electing a man with so little experience and so many questionable ties? It baffles me. But that's the MEDIA for ya! He should have NEVER beaten Hillary, but he did because the media loved him. And if the media wins, YOU LOSE. So make sure your television is in good working order, because if Barack is elected, you're going to need it!
SAUL ALINSKY
Here's reason #50(approximately) why Barack Obama is wrong for America . . . he graduated from the "Alinsky School." Do YOURSELF a favor, and Google "Alinsky Obama" and see for yourself. Why doesn't Obama mention Alinsky? He doesn't want you to KNOW that he is as radical as he is. he is relying on the media being in the tank for him, and they are.
Who is Saul Alinsky? Or WAS should I say. He died in 1972. He was a Marxist grassroots organizer who spent much of his life organizing rent strikes and protesting conditions of the poor in Chicago in the 1930s. Alinsky had a true genius for formulating tactical battle plans for the radical left. He wrote two books outlining his organizational principles and strategies: "Reveille for Radicals" (1946) and "Rules for Radicals" (1971).
"Rules for Radicals" begins with an unusual tribute: "From all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer." The devil challenged authority and got his own kingdom, and that goes to the heart of what left is really about. That of course is to get power any way you can, including lying, cheating and stealing. The ultimate rule is that the ends justify the means.
Alinsky asserted that he was more concerned with the acquisition of power than anything else: "My aim here is to suggest how to organize for power: how to get it and how to use it." This is not to be done with assistance to the poor, nor even by organizing the poor to demand assistance: "
Alinsky's radicals found a perfect vehicle for their destruction of the American system and more particularly for taking and maintaining power. That instrument was the Democratic Party.
I could go on forever. You can Google it if you like. Why don't you Google "Alinsky voter fraud" and see what you come up with. We have a guy with ZERO experience, who voted "present" 130 times in the state senate, whose wife spent her life not being proud of this great country, who dealt with Tony Rezko in Chicago, sat and listened to Rev. Wright spew anti-american themes for twenty years . . . and was taught by Saul Alinsky . . . just read about Alinsky and see how IDENTICAL Obama's views are to that of Alinsky. Do it though, only if you care. If your cozy little Myspace world is that important, knock yourself out. But kiss this country goodbye if Obama pulls this one off.
Who is Saul Alinsky? Or WAS should I say. He died in 1972. He was a Marxist grassroots organizer who spent much of his life organizing rent strikes and protesting conditions of the poor in Chicago in the 1930s. Alinsky had a true genius for formulating tactical battle plans for the radical left. He wrote two books outlining his organizational principles and strategies: "Reveille for Radicals" (1946) and "Rules for Radicals" (1971).
"Rules for Radicals" begins with an unusual tribute: "From all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer." The devil challenged authority and got his own kingdom, and that goes to the heart of what left is really about. That of course is to get power any way you can, including lying, cheating and stealing. The ultimate rule is that the ends justify the means.
Alinsky asserted that he was more concerned with the acquisition of power than anything else: "My aim here is to suggest how to organize for power: how to get it and how to use it." This is not to be done with assistance to the poor, nor even by organizing the poor to demand assistance: "
Alinsky's radicals found a perfect vehicle for their destruction of the American system and more particularly for taking and maintaining power. That instrument was the Democratic Party.
I could go on forever. You can Google it if you like. Why don't you Google "Alinsky voter fraud" and see what you come up with. We have a guy with ZERO experience, who voted "present" 130 times in the state senate, whose wife spent her life not being proud of this great country, who dealt with Tony Rezko in Chicago, sat and listened to Rev. Wright spew anti-american themes for twenty years . . . and was taught by Saul Alinsky . . . just read about Alinsky and see how IDENTICAL Obama's views are to that of Alinsky. Do it though, only if you care. If your cozy little Myspace world is that important, knock yourself out. But kiss this country goodbye if Obama pulls this one off.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
The Electoral College
http://www.electoral-vote.com/ is the source for today's blog entry, but you can consult jhust about ANY of the many sources for electoral college polling numbers, they all say the same thing . . . Obama only two weeks ago had a commanding lead and now finds himself BEHIND John McCain, which has the Democrats freaked out. Obama, who can't speak spontaneously now uses a TELEPROMPTER every day now . . . reading the words of speech writers who have never held office. Can you say "puppet?" I knew ya could.
Particularly disturbing to Obama should be the gains McCain has made in Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado. And the WORSE NEWS for Obama yet, as if it weren't bad enough already . . . sit down for this . . . he has SLIM LEADS in New York and New Jersey, two of the most liberal states in the nation! He has only a 4% lead in those two states. Finally, two other states, Minnesota and Michigan are virtually tied, and Obama fears losing them as well. If McCain can snag Ohio, Pennsylvania, either Michigan or Minnesota, and Colorado . . . send the fat lady out.
Lessons learned:
1)The media should have vetted Obama more, instead of giving him a free pass, helping him to beat Hillary(then the Democrats would have had a candidate that COULD have won instead of an inexperenced radical liberal with poor judgment) . . . . AND . . .
2)Obama made the mistake of his life by not selecting Hillary as his running mate, a WOMAN who actually received more votes than HE DID. It just goes to show you, Obama allowed his personal dislike for Hillary to prevent him from using good judgment, and the Republicans are the ones benefiting from his poor judgment.
Watch tv in coming weeks, and learn what many of us have known for a year and a half . . . NOBODY has gotten more "earmarks" than Obama, and Obama has associated with nothing but radicals, terrorists, and anti-patriots his entire life. Hardly the kind of guy you woul dtrust with the most POWERFUL position on Earth.
I will be glad when November 4 comes so Obama can just GO AWAY. I am tired of looking at him, and watching him read prepared speeches off of teleprompters.
Finally, ask yourself this: Who would North Korea, Cuba, Russia, Iran, the Taliban, and Al Qaeda want elected? And ask yourself WHY they would want OBAMA in the White House(answer: they can do whatever they want and take advantage of a radical inexperienced liberal with poor judgment). You want another 9/11? Elect Obama and it WILL be the end of the world as we know it. Now go back and enjoy Myspace while there still IS ONE.
Particularly disturbing to Obama should be the gains McCain has made in Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado. And the WORSE NEWS for Obama yet, as if it weren't bad enough already . . . sit down for this . . . he has SLIM LEADS in New York and New Jersey, two of the most liberal states in the nation! He has only a 4% lead in those two states. Finally, two other states, Minnesota and Michigan are virtually tied, and Obama fears losing them as well. If McCain can snag Ohio, Pennsylvania, either Michigan or Minnesota, and Colorado . . . send the fat lady out.
Lessons learned:
1)The media should have vetted Obama more, instead of giving him a free pass, helping him to beat Hillary(then the Democrats would have had a candidate that COULD have won instead of an inexperenced radical liberal with poor judgment) . . . . AND . . .
2)Obama made the mistake of his life by not selecting Hillary as his running mate, a WOMAN who actually received more votes than HE DID. It just goes to show you, Obama allowed his personal dislike for Hillary to prevent him from using good judgment, and the Republicans are the ones benefiting from his poor judgment.
Watch tv in coming weeks, and learn what many of us have known for a year and a half . . . NOBODY has gotten more "earmarks" than Obama, and Obama has associated with nothing but radicals, terrorists, and anti-patriots his entire life. Hardly the kind of guy you woul dtrust with the most POWERFUL position on Earth.
I will be glad when November 4 comes so Obama can just GO AWAY. I am tired of looking at him, and watching him read prepared speeches off of teleprompters.
Finally, ask yourself this: Who would North Korea, Cuba, Russia, Iran, the Taliban, and Al Qaeda want elected? And ask yourself WHY they would want OBAMA in the White House(answer: they can do whatever they want and take advantage of a radical inexperienced liberal with poor judgment). You want another 9/11? Elect Obama and it WILL be the end of the world as we know it. Now go back and enjoy Myspace while there still IS ONE.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
September 11
Yes, today we remembered what happened seven years ago today . . . but why are we so quick to forget about it tomorrow and criticize the Bush administration for fighting the war on terror? Do we not realize that if we let up it will happen here again, and might happen here again ANYWAY? Are we REALLY willing to believe, as a people, that Islamic Extremists . . . terrorists, have lost their HATE of us and our society, and want to kill us? I say we can stop fighting the war on terror the day AFTER any one of us can walk(without a military escort) through the streets of Iran, Israel, Libya, North Korea, Pakistan, or Afghanistan(just to name a few) without fear of being killed just for being an American.
WAKE UP AMERICA! The surge WORKED, and John McCain is the one who insisted that we stay in Iraq to WIN, and victory is in sight now by ALL ACCOUNTS.
Obama has PLEDGED to cut military spending, cut funding for future weapons systems, eliminate nuclear weapons, along with MANY other cuts that would reduce our ability to defend ourselves as we have done now since 9/11. People want to criticize Bush, but one thing is sure: since 9/11 we have taken the battle TO terrorists here in this country, in Afghanistan, Iraq, India, Pakistan, and confronted threats by North Korea and Iran. Not to mention that confrontations with Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba seem to be on the horizon.
You WANT another terror attack? Vote Obama and you will get your wish.
Oh, did I forget to mention that his church gave a LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD to Louis Farrakhan, and his pastor(Rev. Wright) traveled to Libya to meet with Moammar Gadaffi? Oh no, he's not muslim at all! He just has a Muslim name, a Muslim FAMILY, went to a Muslim school, and is supported by Muslims around the world to be President. How STUPID do you have to be!?!??!
WAKE UP AMERICA! The surge WORKED, and John McCain is the one who insisted that we stay in Iraq to WIN, and victory is in sight now by ALL ACCOUNTS.
Obama has PLEDGED to cut military spending, cut funding for future weapons systems, eliminate nuclear weapons, along with MANY other cuts that would reduce our ability to defend ourselves as we have done now since 9/11. People want to criticize Bush, but one thing is sure: since 9/11 we have taken the battle TO terrorists here in this country, in Afghanistan, Iraq, India, Pakistan, and confronted threats by North Korea and Iran. Not to mention that confrontations with Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba seem to be on the horizon.
You WANT another terror attack? Vote Obama and you will get your wish.
Oh, did I forget to mention that his church gave a LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD to Louis Farrakhan, and his pastor(Rev. Wright) traveled to Libya to meet with Moammar Gadaffi? Oh no, he's not muslim at all! He just has a Muslim name, a Muslim FAMILY, went to a Muslim school, and is supported by Muslims around the world to be President. How STUPID do you have to be!?!??!
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
McGenius
Ya know, if Obama would have selected Hillary as his running mate, NOTHING the Republicans could have done would be able to win in November. But Obama put HIMSELF first, ignored the 18 MILLION voters who voted for her(more voted for her than Obama) . . . and deeply offended Hillary's supporters and drove some of them to McCain as soon as Biden was announced. You know Biden, a CAREER WASHINGTON POLITICIAN? Yeah, that's change! can you say "lipstick on a pig?" I knew ya could.
Anyway, sources close to McCain's campaign reveal that Huckabee, Romney, and Palenty were tossed out as decoys to take the pressure off of Obama, to make him much more comfortable in dissing Hillary. Wise move. None of the aforementioned three were actually in SERIOUS consideration for the Republican VP nomination a month before Biden was announced as Obama's running mate.
And THAT opened the door. Obama's POOR DECISION MAKING will be his undoing. he now knows that he made this mistake, and Sarah Palin has him rattled. He stutters, stammers, and fumbles around, and seems to be attacking sarah Palin more than he attacks McCain.
And the bad decision making continues . . . today two prominent Democrats 1)compared Obama to Jesus(community organizers)/Palin to Pilate(both "governors") and 2)said that Palin's only qualification seems to be that she "didn't get an abortion." The attacks keep coming, and the American people keep responding, going to the McCain/Palin ticket in droves.
I will sleep well tonight. We're in a race against complete morons. McCain/Palin '08 Baby!
DRILL BABY DRILL!!!!
Anyway, sources close to McCain's campaign reveal that Huckabee, Romney, and Palenty were tossed out as decoys to take the pressure off of Obama, to make him much more comfortable in dissing Hillary. Wise move. None of the aforementioned three were actually in SERIOUS consideration for the Republican VP nomination a month before Biden was announced as Obama's running mate.
And THAT opened the door. Obama's POOR DECISION MAKING will be his undoing. he now knows that he made this mistake, and Sarah Palin has him rattled. He stutters, stammers, and fumbles around, and seems to be attacking sarah Palin more than he attacks McCain.
And the bad decision making continues . . . today two prominent Democrats 1)compared Obama to Jesus(community organizers)/Palin to Pilate(both "governors") and 2)said that Palin's only qualification seems to be that she "didn't get an abortion." The attacks keep coming, and the American people keep responding, going to the McCain/Palin ticket in droves.
I will sleep well tonight. We're in a race against complete morons. McCain/Palin '08 Baby!
DRILL BABY DRILL!!!!
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Obama--is he muslim, and what does it matter?
Look, I am not saying he is, and I am not saying he isn't. Who knows? But given the FACT that we are at war with Islamic terrorists. We just can't take the chance! Here, take it form Moammar Gadaffi . . . and see who HE wants to be President(bu the way, Obama's own brother, who lives in Kenya and has an income of $1/month says Obama is Muslim but I digress):
"It has been proven that there is no democracy in the United States.(who proved this? Did I miss something?) Rather it is a dictatorship no different than the dictatorships of Hitler, Napoleon, Mussolini, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, and the rest of the tyrants.
In the days of crazy Reagan, the American president issued an executive order to launch a war against Libya, for example, a presidential order to besiege Libya, a presidential order to boycott Libya, and so on. Is this a democracy or a dictatorship?
"It has been proven that there is no democracy in the United States.(who proved this? Did I miss something?) Rather it is a dictatorship no different than the dictatorships of Hitler, Napoleon, Mussolini, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, and the rest of the tyrants.
In the days of crazy Reagan, the American president issued an executive order to launch a war against Libya, for example, a presidential order to besiege Libya, a presidential order to boycott Libya, and so on. Is this a democracy or a dictatorship?
There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama. All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency."
There ya go . . . EVERY Islamic radical leader in the world supports ONE MAN . . .BARACK OBAMA. Are we going to let Moammar Gadaffi and others PICK our president? And isn't the FACT that Gadaffi supports Obama ENOUGH to NOT ELECT HIM!?!?!? Especially since there is SOME DOUBT as to his Muslim heritage, beliefs, and contacts. (See Tony Rezko-a Syrian who financed Obama's political career until being thrown in prison this year for bribery, extortion, and fraud).Monday, September 8, 2008
RUSSIA
This is reason ENOUGH to elect McCain. Today It was announced that Russia is going to help Iran with their nuclear ambitions. Can you say World War III? Russia HATES the USA. SO guess what? This fall the Russian Navy is going to have a naval exercise in the Caribbean. Nice! Wait, I'm not finished yet! Russia has also decided to embrace two more of our enemies, namely Cuba and Venezuela, and is talking about placing MISSILES at both locations.
Is it not ABUNDANTLY CLEAR that Russia has now decided that it is going to take us on? Who can handle that challenge? Obama or McCain. YOU DECIDE.
Is it not ABUNDANTLY CLEAR that Russia has now decided that it is going to take us on? Who can handle that challenge? Obama or McCain. YOU DECIDE.
Clinton Supporters
Before the RNC, 22% of Hillary's supporters said they would vote for McCain. AFTER Sarah Palin gave her speech last Wednesday night that number increased to 29%.
Doing the math . . . that's 18,000,000 Hillary supporters . . . . 22% comes to 3.96 Million. Sarah increased that number to 5.22 Million(29%).
THANKS HILLARY!
I wonder if Barack realizes what a big mistake he made by not putting Hillary on the ticket. He and Hillary MIGHT have given McCain and Palin a run for the money, but by naming Joe Biden . . . it looks like it is lights out!!!
Doing the math . . . that's 18,000,000 Hillary supporters . . . . 22% comes to 3.96 Million. Sarah increased that number to 5.22 Million(29%).
THANKS HILLARY!
I wonder if Barack realizes what a big mistake he made by not putting Hillary on the ticket. He and Hillary MIGHT have given McCain and Palin a run for the money, but by naming Joe Biden . . . it looks like it is lights out!!!
Sunday, September 7, 2008
Tony Rezko
Here we go . . . yet ANOTHER of Obama's associates, this time a SYRIAN . . . Tony Rezko. Did you REALLY think that Obama could fly through the political ranks in Chicago that quickly without a little "help?"
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2008/01/10/after-near-total-silence-abc-finally-investigates-obama-land-deal
"Rezko had quietly played a role in Obama's purchase of a new home. Obama bought the house on Chicago's south side in June, 2005, after he had been elected to the U.S. Senate. According to Obama, the owner wanted to sell the house together with a next door vacant lot which Obama apparently did not want. Instead, Rezko's wife bought the empty lot for full price. 625,000. And according to Obama, he bought the house paying $1.65 million, for $300,000 under the asking price, all on the same day. Obama says the price was dropped because the house had been on the market for some time." So the price of the HOUSE was dropped $300,000 . . . but the empty lot went for FULL ASKING PRICE. Yeah, that makes sense.
"Obama says no lobbyist would be permitted to work in his White House. And as a state senator in Illinois, and now in Washington, he has pushed new ethics reforms laws. All of which makes his relationship with an accused Illinois political fixer and influence peddler all the more unusual. His name is Tony Rezko, known in Illinois politics as a back-room operator who did favors and raised campaign money for politicians and benefited in return. Rezko will go on trial next month to face charges growing out of a three-year long undercover FBI investigation involving bribes, kickbacks and extortion."
OBAMA'S LIES: Obama has given a series of various explanations about the deal. First, he told the Chicago Tribune that he didn't recall what his conversations were with Rezko. Four days later, he told the Chicago Sun Times that he did recall telling Rezko about the property. Last May, as a candidate for president, Obama acknowledged to George Stephanopoulos that Rezko could become an issue, even though everything had been above board and legal. So would you REALLY consider electing a man who is so OBVIOUSLY dishonest???
"Rezko and people in his circle have given Obama more than $120,000 for his U.S. and state senate campaigns. A spokesman for Obama says the Senator has donated the 44,000 of that to charity since the indictments in Chicago. And the senator insists no favors were asked of him by Rezko and none was granted." Yeah right. This man just HAPPENS to buy the empty lot next door for FULL ASKING PRICE on the SAME DAY as Obama's purchase for $300,000 UNDER asking price. How stupid does he think we are!?!??! This man, who now stands convicted of bribing politicians did everything with Obama completely on the level, right? Of course it was on the level! That is why Barack was so FORTHCOMING when asked about it!!!!
Here is what Wikipedia had to say . . . "Antoin "Tony" Rezko (born 1955 in Aleppo, Syria) is an American political fundraiser, restaurateur, and real estate developer in Chicago, Illinois convicted on several counts of fraud and bribery in 2008. Rezko has been involved in fundraising for local Illinois Democratic and Republican politicians since the 1980s. He focused primarily on Chicago-area Democrats; for example, Rezko was one of Barack Obama's first major financial contributors."
William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Michelle Obama, and now Tony Rezko . . . how much more evidence to you need?
No way, no how, NOBAMA.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2008/01/10/after-near-total-silence-abc-finally-investigates-obama-land-deal
"Rezko had quietly played a role in Obama's purchase of a new home. Obama bought the house on Chicago's south side in June, 2005, after he had been elected to the U.S. Senate. According to Obama, the owner wanted to sell the house together with a next door vacant lot which Obama apparently did not want. Instead, Rezko's wife bought the empty lot for full price. 625,000. And according to Obama, he bought the house paying $1.65 million, for $300,000 under the asking price, all on the same day. Obama says the price was dropped because the house had been on the market for some time." So the price of the HOUSE was dropped $300,000 . . . but the empty lot went for FULL ASKING PRICE. Yeah, that makes sense.
"Obama says no lobbyist would be permitted to work in his White House. And as a state senator in Illinois, and now in Washington, he has pushed new ethics reforms laws. All of which makes his relationship with an accused Illinois political fixer and influence peddler all the more unusual. His name is Tony Rezko, known in Illinois politics as a back-room operator who did favors and raised campaign money for politicians and benefited in return. Rezko will go on trial next month to face charges growing out of a three-year long undercover FBI investigation involving bribes, kickbacks and extortion."
OBAMA'S LIES: Obama has given a series of various explanations about the deal. First, he told the Chicago Tribune that he didn't recall what his conversations were with Rezko. Four days later, he told the Chicago Sun Times that he did recall telling Rezko about the property. Last May, as a candidate for president, Obama acknowledged to George Stephanopoulos that Rezko could become an issue, even though everything had been above board and legal. So would you REALLY consider electing a man who is so OBVIOUSLY dishonest???
"Rezko and people in his circle have given Obama more than $120,000 for his U.S. and state senate campaigns. A spokesman for Obama says the Senator has donated the 44,000 of that to charity since the indictments in Chicago. And the senator insists no favors were asked of him by Rezko and none was granted." Yeah right. This man just HAPPENS to buy the empty lot next door for FULL ASKING PRICE on the SAME DAY as Obama's purchase for $300,000 UNDER asking price. How stupid does he think we are!?!??! This man, who now stands convicted of bribing politicians did everything with Obama completely on the level, right? Of course it was on the level! That is why Barack was so FORTHCOMING when asked about it!!!!
Here is what Wikipedia had to say . . . "Antoin "Tony" Rezko (born 1955 in Aleppo, Syria) is an American political fundraiser, restaurateur, and real estate developer in Chicago, Illinois convicted on several counts of fraud and bribery in 2008. Rezko has been involved in fundraising for local Illinois Democratic and Republican politicians since the 1980s. He focused primarily on Chicago-area Democrats; for example, Rezko was one of Barack Obama's first major financial contributors."
William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Michelle Obama, and now Tony Rezko . . . how much more evidence to you need?
No way, no how, NOBAMA.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Michelle Obama becomes proud for the first time
By now the whole world knows how selflessly Cindy McCain has given of herself, traveling the WORLD to help people overcome huge obstacles. She even brought two little girls back from Bangladesh, adopting one of them. So while the left-wing media wants to bash the McCains for having seven houses, the truth is that NOBODY has given of themselves as much as Cindy McCain. By the way, Barack made $4 Million last year. Yeah, HE'S "one of us," right? Whatever.
Michelle Obama . . . a woman that would LIKE to be our next first lady, has shamed us all with her comments, and is more deserving to be the LAST LADY instead of the FIRST LADY.
Again, I get much of my information from Wikipedia. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Obama)
On February 18, 2008, Michelle Obama commented in Milwaukee, Wisconsin that "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback." Lets stop there for a second. Although I disagreed with America's choices in elections in the past, I have NEVER stopped being proud of my country. And Michelle Obama shows, ONCE AGAIN, the kinds of people barack surrounds himself with, and identifies with.
Later that night she reworded her response: "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change." So let me get this straight. For the past 50 years she has not been proud, but NOW she is proud because 1)her husband is doing well, and 2)people are hungry for change. She has not had reason to NOT be proud of this great country for ONE SECOND of her life. But NOW she is proud because her husband is doing well and "people want change." I guess if her husband WASN'T doing well she would be less proud? This shows how the Obama's believe the universe revolves around THEM.
Perhaps Obama has the POTENTIAL to be a good president . . . SOMEDAY. Not now. Let HIS wife travel the world and help children everywhere she goes. Let Barack spend a few decades as a senator instead of trying to jump straight from FRESHMAN SENATOR to PRESIDENT. And let Barack spend some time proving to the world he has the JUDGMENT to affiliate with people better than Rev. Wright, William Ayers, Tony Resco, and give Michelle Obama some time to learn how to be proud of this great nation no matter WHO is president, no matter how well her husband is doing, and no matter how much or little people "want change." We shouldn't just be proud of our country when people seem to want the things WE WANT. That is selfish, and we need a President who is SELFLESS. That man is John McCain.
SUMMARY: For twenty-six years Michelle Obama, using her OWN WORDS, has not been proud of her country ONCE . . . but now that 1)her husband is "doing well" and 2)people seem to want what SHE wants, "change," she is suddenly proud for the first time. That is digusting, intolerable, and just plain WRONG. And it says SO MUCH about the people Barack chooses to affiliate with, surround himself with, and endear himself to.
Goodnight. And God Bless America!
Michelle Obama . . . a woman that would LIKE to be our next first lady, has shamed us all with her comments, and is more deserving to be the LAST LADY instead of the FIRST LADY.
Again, I get much of my information from Wikipedia. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Obama)
On February 18, 2008, Michelle Obama commented in Milwaukee, Wisconsin that "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback." Lets stop there for a second. Although I disagreed with America's choices in elections in the past, I have NEVER stopped being proud of my country. And Michelle Obama shows, ONCE AGAIN, the kinds of people barack surrounds himself with, and identifies with.
Later that night she reworded her response: "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change." So let me get this straight. For the past 50 years she has not been proud, but NOW she is proud because 1)her husband is doing well, and 2)people are hungry for change. She has not had reason to NOT be proud of this great country for ONE SECOND of her life. But NOW she is proud because her husband is doing well and "people want change." I guess if her husband WASN'T doing well she would be less proud? This shows how the Obama's believe the universe revolves around THEM.
Perhaps Obama has the POTENTIAL to be a good president . . . SOMEDAY. Not now. Let HIS wife travel the world and help children everywhere she goes. Let Barack spend a few decades as a senator instead of trying to jump straight from FRESHMAN SENATOR to PRESIDENT. And let Barack spend some time proving to the world he has the JUDGMENT to affiliate with people better than Rev. Wright, William Ayers, Tony Resco, and give Michelle Obama some time to learn how to be proud of this great nation no matter WHO is president, no matter how well her husband is doing, and no matter how much or little people "want change." We shouldn't just be proud of our country when people seem to want the things WE WANT. That is selfish, and we need a President who is SELFLESS. That man is John McCain.
SUMMARY: For twenty-six years Michelle Obama, using her OWN WORDS, has not been proud of her country ONCE . . . but now that 1)her husband is "doing well" and 2)people seem to want what SHE wants, "change," she is suddenly proud for the first time. That is digusting, intolerable, and just plain WRONG. And it says SO MUCH about the people Barack chooses to affiliate with, surround himself with, and endear himself to.
Goodnight. And God Bless America!
The Reverend Jeremiah Wright
Who is Rev. Jeremiah Wright anyway? These excerpts were taken from Wikipedia regarding the Reverend. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright)
Statement by Rev. Wright in 2001, just after the September 11 attacks:
"I heard Ambassador Peck on an interview yesterday. Did anybody else see him or hear him? He was on Fox News. This is a white man, and he was upsetting the Fox News commentators to no end. He pointed out — did you see him, John? — a white man, he pointed out, ambassador, that what Malcolm X said when he got silenced by Elijah Muhammad was in fact true — America's chickens are coming home to roost."
That was SEVEN YEARS AGO! And until just a few months ago, Obama continued to be a member of Wright's church. His comment (quoting Malcolm X) that "America's chickens are coming home to roost" was widely interpreted as meaning that America had brought the September 11, 2001 attacks upon itself.
"Wright spoke of the United States taking land from the Indian tribes by what he labeled as terror, bombing Grenada, Panama, Libya, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, and argued that the United States supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and South Africa."
"We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and The Pentagon, and we never batted an eye... and now we are indignant, because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought back into our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost."
“[The United States] government lied about their belief that all men were created equal. The truth is they believed that all white men were created equal. The truth is they did not even believe that white women were created equal, in creation nor civilization. The government had to pass an amendment to the Constitution to get white women the vote. Then the government had to pass an equal rights amendment to get equal protection under the law for women. The government still thinks a woman has no rights over her own body, and between Uncle Clarence [Thomas], who sexually harassed Anita Hill, and a closeted Klan court, that is a throwback to the 19th century, handpicked by Daddy Bush, Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford, between Clarence and that stacked court, they are about to undo Roe vs. Wade, just like they are about to un-do affirmative action. The government lied in its founding documents and the government is still lying today. Governments lie.”
“The government lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq being a threat to the United States peace. And guess what else? If they don’t find them some weapons of mass destruction, they gonna do just like the LAPD, and plant the some weapons of mass destruction. Governments lie.”
GET THIS: The title of Obama's memoir, The Audacity of Hope, was inspired by one of Wright's sermons. Inspired by a man he has known for twenty years, married he and his wife, baptized his children . . . but he "didn't know" the things Wright was saying? Please.
Wright was scheduled to give the public invocation before Obama's presidential announcement, but Obama withdrew the invitation the night before the event. Gee, I wonder why? But he nonetheless continued going to that church and supporting that pastor for another year and a half!
In 2007 Wright was appointed to Barack Obama's African American Religious Leadership Committee, a group of over 170 national black religious leaders who supported Obama's bid for the Democratic nomination; however, it was announced in March 2008 that Wright was no longer serving as a member of this group. This was Obama's ATTEMPT to sweep Wright under the rug. If Obama were to win this election, you can be sure that the Reverend Wright will be right there on that stage with him on November 4. The distancing of Rev. Wright was only temporary. If Obama wins, I wouldn't be surprised if Wright got a cabinet position.
Go to Youtube and check out some of the Reverend's now famous quotes for yourself. But the bottom line is THERE IS TOO MUCH ON THE LINE to even THINK about letting a man who surrounds himself with terrorists(see William Ayers) and radicals(Rev. Wright) get anywhere near the White House.
Tomorrow we get a look at Michelle Obama. You will soon see that Obama has SURROUNDED himself, BLANKETED himself in associations with people who do not share the values that most ALL OF US SHARE. And THEREFORE, we should all give Obama a great big "thanks, but no thanks."
God Bless America!
Statement by Rev. Wright in 2001, just after the September 11 attacks:
"I heard Ambassador Peck on an interview yesterday. Did anybody else see him or hear him? He was on Fox News. This is a white man, and he was upsetting the Fox News commentators to no end. He pointed out — did you see him, John? — a white man, he pointed out, ambassador, that what Malcolm X said when he got silenced by Elijah Muhammad was in fact true — America's chickens are coming home to roost."
That was SEVEN YEARS AGO! And until just a few months ago, Obama continued to be a member of Wright's church. His comment (quoting Malcolm X) that "America's chickens are coming home to roost" was widely interpreted as meaning that America had brought the September 11, 2001 attacks upon itself.
"Wright spoke of the United States taking land from the Indian tribes by what he labeled as terror, bombing Grenada, Panama, Libya, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, and argued that the United States supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and South Africa."
"We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and The Pentagon, and we never batted an eye... and now we are indignant, because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought back into our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost."
“[The United States] government lied about their belief that all men were created equal. The truth is they believed that all white men were created equal. The truth is they did not even believe that white women were created equal, in creation nor civilization. The government had to pass an amendment to the Constitution to get white women the vote. Then the government had to pass an equal rights amendment to get equal protection under the law for women. The government still thinks a woman has no rights over her own body, and between Uncle Clarence [Thomas], who sexually harassed Anita Hill, and a closeted Klan court, that is a throwback to the 19th century, handpicked by Daddy Bush, Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford, between Clarence and that stacked court, they are about to undo Roe vs. Wade, just like they are about to un-do affirmative action. The government lied in its founding documents and the government is still lying today. Governments lie.”
“The government lied about Pearl Harbor too. They knew the Japanese were going to attack. Governments lie. The government lied about the Gulf of Tonkin. They wanted that resolution to get us in the Vietnam War. Governments lie. The government lied about Nelson Mandela and our CIA helped put him in prison and keep him there for 27 years. The South African government lied on Nelson Mandela. Governments lie."
"The government lied about the Tuskegee experiment. They purposely infected African American men with syphilis. Governments lie. The government lied about bombing Cambodia and Richard Nixon stood in front of the camera, ‘Let me make myself perfectly clear…’ Governments lie. The government lied about the drugs for arms Contra scheme orchestrated by Oliver North, and then the government pardoned all the perpetrators so they could get better jobs in the government. Governments lie.... The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. Governments lie. The government lied about a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein and a connection between 9.11.01 and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Governments lie.”
“The government lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq being a threat to the United States peace. And guess what else? If they don’t find them some weapons of mass destruction, they gonna do just like the LAPD, and plant the some weapons of mass destruction. Governments lie.”
"And the United States of America government, when it came to treating her citizens of Indian descent fairly, she failed. She put them on reservations. When it came to treating her citizens of Japanese descent fairly, she failed. She put them in internment prison camps. When it came to treating her citizens of African descent fairly, America failed. She put them in chains, the government put them on slave quarters, put them on auction blocks, put them in cotton field, put them in inferior schools, put them in substandard housing, put them in scientific experiments, put them in the lowest paying jobs, put them outside the equal protection of the law, kept them out of their racist bastions of higher education and locked them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness.... The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, not God Bless America. God damn America — that's in the Bible — for killing innocent people. God damn America, as long as she pretends to act like she is God, and she is supreme. The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent."
THIS is the PASTOR of the church Obama has belonged to for TWENTY YEARS? THIS is the man who married Michelle and Barack Obama? THIS is the man who baptized their two children? THIS is the man they sat and listened to for TWENTY YEARS and didn't WALK OUT in disgust? Yes. But WHY? Obama was flying up the political ladder, and sitting in this radical church, listening to this RADICAL man who preched to 10,000+ each Sunday was a means to an end. Oprah Winfrey belonged to this church for a short time. But not long after joining, Oprah left. Barack stayed.
THIS is the man who is supposed to have the JUDGMENT to be commander in chief? I don't think so.
GET THIS: The title of Obama's memoir, The Audacity of Hope, was inspired by one of Wright's sermons. Inspired by a man he has known for twenty years, married he and his wife, baptized his children . . . but he "didn't know" the things Wright was saying? Please.
Wright was scheduled to give the public invocation before Obama's presidential announcement, but Obama withdrew the invitation the night before the event. Gee, I wonder why? But he nonetheless continued going to that church and supporting that pastor for another year and a half!
In 2007 Wright was appointed to Barack Obama's African American Religious Leadership Committee, a group of over 170 national black religious leaders who supported Obama's bid for the Democratic nomination; however, it was announced in March 2008 that Wright was no longer serving as a member of this group. This was Obama's ATTEMPT to sweep Wright under the rug. If Obama were to win this election, you can be sure that the Reverend Wright will be right there on that stage with him on November 4. The distancing of Rev. Wright was only temporary. If Obama wins, I wouldn't be surprised if Wright got a cabinet position.
Go to Youtube and check out some of the Reverend's now famous quotes for yourself. But the bottom line is THERE IS TOO MUCH ON THE LINE to even THINK about letting a man who surrounds himself with terrorists(see William Ayers) and radicals(Rev. Wright) get anywhere near the White House.
Tomorrow we get a look at Michelle Obama. You will soon see that Obama has SURROUNDED himself, BLANKETED himself in associations with people who do not share the values that most ALL OF US SHARE. And THEREFORE, we should all give Obama a great big "thanks, but no thanks."
God Bless America!
For Sale: Land of the Free
When I woke up this morning I turned on the radio and just lay there as so many thoughts raced through my head. And so there will be SEVERAL blog entries today and this evening. I named this blog 1,001 reasons nobama, but could have easily made it 10,001.
If you woke up, looked out in the front yard, and saw that someone had placed a for sale sign in your front yard, you would go out and take it down, RIGHT?(assuming it wasn't a realtor you hired because YOU are selling your house). You wouldn't LET someone sell YOUR house, would you? It's YOURS to sell. Well this great country is yours too. And not just a little piece of it. ALL OF IT. It's yours, it's mine. It's ours. And it's not for sale. Not today, not ever. Each of has a vote in this matter, and we can either SELL the country, and vote for Obama, or we can take the sign down and vote for McCain.
Isn't Barack Obama trying to BUY your vote? Obama says he is all about "change," but isn't he doing the SAME thing that Democrats ALWAYS do to get elected, buy your vote? Who would vote for him if he wasn't promising them FREE health care and all the other goodies in his bag?
And while I am on the subject, seems to me that when Bill Clinton was asking for your vote, he did the "health care for everyone" thing . . . but in his eight years did he deliver on that promise? No. And who would PAY for it anyway? The working class. That means, no matter WHAT they say, taxes have to go UP, UP, UP for the people who WORK to pay for all these goodies politicians promise.
So the trick is to paint the last eight years as being as bad as possible so people will want "change", point to home foreclosures, highlight a few poor people without health insurance, convince people they are miserable and promise that you are going to "make everything better."
Here's a NEWSFLASH: The Senate and House of Representatives pass laws, the PRESIDENT DOESN'T, and both houses are controlled by Democrats. So if things REALLY ARE THAT BAD, it's the Democrats who should be taking the blame. But Obama thinks we are all stupid enough to just blame the President for every little thing in the world that isn't perfect. Which reminds me . . . things may not be perfect here. They never will be. This is the USA, not Oz. Go ahead and name a few countries that you believe have it better than us. Mexico? their citizens sneak into the US every day. THIS IS WHERE THEY WANT TO BE! How about China? a booming economy, but ZERO human rights. No freedom of religion, and they have a ONE-CHILD law that is strictly enforced. No child is allowed to have a brother or sister without the family paying a HUGE FINE(usually several years of wages) to have that additional child. Would you rather SELL your freedom to live with 30 of your relatives, sleep on the floor, and be told by your country how many children you can have... but have a "booming economy?"
I remind you that this IS the greatest country in the world, and that is why WHAT WE SAY GOES. There isn't ONE NATION that could even THINK about standing toe to toe with us. Which brings me to my FINAL POINT of this entry . . . . The President, no matter WHAT they say in their speeches, is basically limited to these major powers:
1)Commander in Chief
2)Veto Power
3)Supreme Court appointments
Barack Obama can no more deliver on his promises that I CAN. It isn't in the power of the President to implement one single law. He doesn't MAKE law, he ENFORCES it. So who would be the better Commander in Chief? A no brainer, right? Even the left-wing media acknowledges that Americans prefer McCain to Obama in this critical area. How about Veto Power? Who is more likely to VETO bills chocked with earmarks and wasteful spending? Again, a no-brainer. Obama's answer to EVERYTHING is: "find a problem, create a bureaucracy, spend some money." McCain is the Maverick. And who do you want making lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court? A Freshman senator who has written TWO books about himself? Or a man who has spent his LIFE fighting for this country, both in uniform AND in Washington?
As Americans, we have to keep doing what we have always done. The American Dream is not a handout, it is something you earn. You don't wake up one morning and find the American Dream under your Christmas Tree. If that were even possible, Santa Claus would be in the White House, not George W. Bush. You know, the guy who did such a bad job the first four years that we gave him ANOTHER FOUR!?!?!? Yeah, that guy. Before I close let me say that George W. Bush has been a FANTASTIC Commander in Chief, and THAT is the most important job a President has in this great country. So I leave you now with a trivia question:
Q: Exactly how many acts of terrorism have we had in the United States since September 11, 2001?
A: ZERO.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
If you woke up, looked out in the front yard, and saw that someone had placed a for sale sign in your front yard, you would go out and take it down, RIGHT?(assuming it wasn't a realtor you hired because YOU are selling your house). You wouldn't LET someone sell YOUR house, would you? It's YOURS to sell. Well this great country is yours too. And not just a little piece of it. ALL OF IT. It's yours, it's mine. It's ours. And it's not for sale. Not today, not ever. Each of has a vote in this matter, and we can either SELL the country, and vote for Obama, or we can take the sign down and vote for McCain.
Isn't Barack Obama trying to BUY your vote? Obama says he is all about "change," but isn't he doing the SAME thing that Democrats ALWAYS do to get elected, buy your vote? Who would vote for him if he wasn't promising them FREE health care and all the other goodies in his bag?
And while I am on the subject, seems to me that when Bill Clinton was asking for your vote, he did the "health care for everyone" thing . . . but in his eight years did he deliver on that promise? No. And who would PAY for it anyway? The working class. That means, no matter WHAT they say, taxes have to go UP, UP, UP for the people who WORK to pay for all these goodies politicians promise.
So the trick is to paint the last eight years as being as bad as possible so people will want "change", point to home foreclosures, highlight a few poor people without health insurance, convince people they are miserable and promise that you are going to "make everything better."
Here's a NEWSFLASH: The Senate and House of Representatives pass laws, the PRESIDENT DOESN'T, and both houses are controlled by Democrats. So if things REALLY ARE THAT BAD, it's the Democrats who should be taking the blame. But Obama thinks we are all stupid enough to just blame the President for every little thing in the world that isn't perfect. Which reminds me . . . things may not be perfect here. They never will be. This is the USA, not Oz. Go ahead and name a few countries that you believe have it better than us. Mexico? their citizens sneak into the US every day. THIS IS WHERE THEY WANT TO BE! How about China? a booming economy, but ZERO human rights. No freedom of religion, and they have a ONE-CHILD law that is strictly enforced. No child is allowed to have a brother or sister without the family paying a HUGE FINE(usually several years of wages) to have that additional child. Would you rather SELL your freedom to live with 30 of your relatives, sleep on the floor, and be told by your country how many children you can have... but have a "booming economy?"
I remind you that this IS the greatest country in the world, and that is why WHAT WE SAY GOES. There isn't ONE NATION that could even THINK about standing toe to toe with us. Which brings me to my FINAL POINT of this entry . . . . The President, no matter WHAT they say in their speeches, is basically limited to these major powers:
1)Commander in Chief
2)Veto Power
3)Supreme Court appointments
Barack Obama can no more deliver on his promises that I CAN. It isn't in the power of the President to implement one single law. He doesn't MAKE law, he ENFORCES it. So who would be the better Commander in Chief? A no brainer, right? Even the left-wing media acknowledges that Americans prefer McCain to Obama in this critical area. How about Veto Power? Who is more likely to VETO bills chocked with earmarks and wasteful spending? Again, a no-brainer. Obama's answer to EVERYTHING is: "find a problem, create a bureaucracy, spend some money." McCain is the Maverick. And who do you want making lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court? A Freshman senator who has written TWO books about himself? Or a man who has spent his LIFE fighting for this country, both in uniform AND in Washington?
As Americans, we have to keep doing what we have always done. The American Dream is not a handout, it is something you earn. You don't wake up one morning and find the American Dream under your Christmas Tree. If that were even possible, Santa Claus would be in the White House, not George W. Bush. You know, the guy who did such a bad job the first four years that we gave him ANOTHER FOUR!?!?!? Yeah, that guy. Before I close let me say that George W. Bush has been a FANTASTIC Commander in Chief, and THAT is the most important job a President has in this great country. So I leave you now with a trivia question:
Q: Exactly how many acts of terrorism have we had in the United States since September 11, 2001?
A: ZERO.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
Friday, September 5, 2008
Bits & Pieces
In case you watch one of the biased liberal networks that wouldn't DARE reveal such things, here are the FACTS. I am SURE you heard how "the Messiah" got 38 million viewers last week in Denver when he gave his acceptance speech in front of his 80,000 adoring(and uninformed) fans. Such a big deal was made of that. You remember, don't you? It was like a crown in his jewel, a sign of acceptance by the american public, a certification of his "rock star status." This just in . . . John McCain snared a half million MORE than Obama last night in St. Paul. Wow! And what makes this so sweet is the FACT that Obama was carried on TEN networks and McCain was carried on only six.
And while we're talking about ratings . . . Senator Joe Biden, a career politician from inside the beltway(can you say "more of the same?") was seen on ten networks last Wednesday night and was seen by 24 million. Pretty impressive, huh? Well, THIS Wednesday, a woman who nobody heard of eight days ago, Sarah Palin, blew the doors off of Biden, get this . . . 37.2 million!
Check THIS out>>>>> http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/conventions-clinton-and-biden-are-a-big-ratings-draw/
where the headline reads "Conventions: Clinton and Biden Are a Big Ratings Draw". Then Sarah Palin, who HASN'T been on the campaign circuit for nineteen months comes along with over 24 million . . . Guess who got egg on their face? Yep, the New York Times, a left wing rag. Any wonder why newspapers around the country are laying off people and closing their doors? I had to do a SEARCH on the NYTimes site "Palin ratings" to find a tiny paragraph that McCain "essentially reaching the same number of viewers that Barack Obama did last week." No, he SURPASSED them. Why no ARTICLE touting McCain's ratings? Then right below that was ONE LINE, ONE LINE I SAY that simply says " Sarah Palin’s speech reached 37.2 million viewers on Wednesday night." Ten words. Now THAT'S funny! Biden and Clinton are a "big ratings draw," and gets a headline article to show how interested the country is in the Democratic ticket, but when Sarah Barracuda beats them by 13 million viewers, almost single-handedly, she gets ten words. Need any more evidence that the media, tv, radio, online, and print, are a bunch of dufuses with a left wing agenda? Here's the link so you can see this HILARIOUS display of bias yourself:
http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/?s=Palin+ratings&search.x=0&search.y=0&search=Search
Maybe SOMEDAY the media will realize the public wants and deserves FAIR and BALANCED reporting, not EDITORIALS being passed off as reporting. You want to editorialize? Fine. Do it on the editorial page. Fill the whole publication up with nothing BUT editorials if that is what you want to do. But don't call it reporting. That is fraud. Call yourself the "New York Times Left Wing Editorial" and I will have no complaints.
My goal is to have 1,000 hits a day within one week and I can only do that with YOUR help. And the next week I want 10,000 hits a day. A month from now 100,000 hits a day. We can do it, baby! Spread the word . . . and I'll see you crazy(but sane) people tomorrow!!!
And while we're talking about ratings . . . Senator Joe Biden, a career politician from inside the beltway(can you say "more of the same?") was seen on ten networks last Wednesday night and was seen by 24 million. Pretty impressive, huh? Well, THIS Wednesday, a woman who nobody heard of eight days ago, Sarah Palin, blew the doors off of Biden, get this . . . 37.2 million!
Check THIS out>>>>> http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/conventions-clinton-and-biden-are-a-big-ratings-draw/
where the headline reads "Conventions: Clinton and Biden Are a Big Ratings Draw". Then Sarah Palin, who HASN'T been on the campaign circuit for nineteen months comes along with over 24 million . . . Guess who got egg on their face? Yep, the New York Times, a left wing rag. Any wonder why newspapers around the country are laying off people and closing their doors? I had to do a SEARCH on the NYTimes site "Palin ratings" to find a tiny paragraph that McCain "essentially reaching the same number of viewers that Barack Obama did last week." No, he SURPASSED them. Why no ARTICLE touting McCain's ratings? Then right below that was ONE LINE, ONE LINE I SAY that simply says " Sarah Palin’s speech reached 37.2 million viewers on Wednesday night." Ten words. Now THAT'S funny! Biden and Clinton are a "big ratings draw," and gets a headline article to show how interested the country is in the Democratic ticket, but when Sarah Barracuda beats them by 13 million viewers, almost single-handedly, she gets ten words. Need any more evidence that the media, tv, radio, online, and print, are a bunch of dufuses with a left wing agenda? Here's the link so you can see this HILARIOUS display of bias yourself:
http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/?s=Palin+ratings&search.x=0&search.y=0&search=Search
Maybe SOMEDAY the media will realize the public wants and deserves FAIR and BALANCED reporting, not EDITORIALS being passed off as reporting. You want to editorialize? Fine. Do it on the editorial page. Fill the whole publication up with nothing BUT editorials if that is what you want to do. But don't call it reporting. That is fraud. Call yourself the "New York Times Left Wing Editorial" and I will have no complaints.
My goal is to have 1,000 hits a day within one week and I can only do that with YOUR help. And the next week I want 10,000 hits a day. A month from now 100,000 hits a day. We can do it, baby! Spread the word . . . and I'll see you crazy(but sane) people tomorrow!!!
WELCOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Perhaps you got an e-mail from me, perhaps you stumbled onto my blog by accident. in any event, I just couldn't sit and no nothing one second longer after watching Bristol Palin's pregnancy get as much television coverage as Hurricane Gustav. I heard about all the "left wing blogs" that are making vicious attacks against Sarah Palin and so I thought . . . "two can play this game." Apparently we need a few more RIGHT WING blogs! I have e-mailed every person whose e-mail address I could find and I ask YOU to do whatever you can do for the McCain/Palin ticket. Go to www.johnmccain.com and do what you can. Not for me, but for our great country.
It's high time that WE THE PEOPLE inform ourselves of the truth and stop allowing "polls" and "talking heads" to tell us what happened, how to vote, and WHO is going to win. I don't remember any pollsters EVER calling me to ask me who I am voting for. Have they called YOU? I didn't think so.
In the days ahead I hope you will realize how DANGEROUS a proposition it is to put a freshman senator with ties to radicals and extremists, a man who voted "present" over 130 times in the Illinois senate, and a man whose wife was never proud of this country "until now" in the White House. Thanks for stopping by . . . tomorrow I plan to examine Obama's relationship with yet ANOTHER radical . . . the Reverend Wright.
God Bless America!
It's high time that WE THE PEOPLE inform ourselves of the truth and stop allowing "polls" and "talking heads" to tell us what happened, how to vote, and WHO is going to win. I don't remember any pollsters EVER calling me to ask me who I am voting for. Have they called YOU? I didn't think so.
In the days ahead I hope you will realize how DANGEROUS a proposition it is to put a freshman senator with ties to radicals and extremists, a man who voted "present" over 130 times in the Illinois senate, and a man whose wife was never proud of this country "until now" in the White House. Thanks for stopping by . . . tomorrow I plan to examine Obama's relationship with yet ANOTHER radical . . . the Reverend Wright.
God Bless America!
William Ayers
What REALLY bothers me is the FACT that the media makes a big deal about Sarah Palin's 17 year old daughter being pregnant, but has refused for almost two years to press Barack Obama the ONE QUESTION that, if answered truthfully, would instantly turn the entire nation off . . . the ONE QUESTION that would END his campaign . . . this fact reveals that 1)the media really doesn't care about right and wrong, but instead in how it can manipulate an outcome, and 2)how lazy the American People have become, delegating their duty to be informed to Tom Brokaw and many other biased morons.
So what is the question? It is coming, but ask yourself, as an AMERICAN, not as a member of one part or the other, is THIS MAN a man you could even THINK about trusting as our commander in chief????
William Ayers co-founded the militant radical left organization Weatherman active during the 1960s and 1970s and was one of its top leaders. Did I mention that Barack Obama kicked off his run for state senate in Illinois in this man's back yard? But I digress. Among other things, in 1969, Ayers participated in planting a bomb at a statue dedicated to police casualties in the 1886 Haymarket Riot. The blast broke almost 100 windows and blew pieces of the statue onto the nearby Kennedy Expressway.
In 1970 Ayers "went underground" with several associates after the Greenwich Village townhouse explosion, in which Weatherman member Ted Gold, Ayers' close friend Terry Robbins, and Ayers girlfriend, Oughton, were killed when a nail bomb that was under construction exploded. Kathy Boudin and Cathy Wilkerson survived the blast. Ayers was not facing criminal charges at the time, but the federal government later filed charges against him.
"We weren't terrorists," Ayers told an interviewer for the Chicago Tribune in 2001. "The reason we weren't terrorists is because we did not commit random acts of terror against people. Terrorism was what was being practiced in the countryside of Vietnam by the United States." In a letter to the editor in the Chicago Tribune, Ayers wrote, "I condemn all forms of terrorism" — although Ayers has admitted bombing government buildings as part of his activities in the group.
So what's the connection to Obama? Obama, who has pretended to barely know the man who hosted his senatorial campaign kick-off barbecue in his BACK YARD, was hand picked by Ayers to sit as Chairman of the Board on a $70 Million trust established in part by Ayers. Are we to give Ayers the benefit of the doubt? That a man who still today brags about his radical acts of terrorism has sudden;y turned philanthropist? Please. If you truly LOVE your country, do a little research for YOURSELF . . . do a simple Google search, educate YOURSELF, and you will soon see that the left wing media has DUPED you once again, and cannot be trusted with the responsibility of keeping you informed. If you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.
NEWSFLASH: here is a link to Ayers' OWN WEB SITE where he is peddling his book: "FUGITIVE DAYS - A MEMOIR" http://www.beacon.org/productdetails.cfm?SKU=7124
This is a quote retrieved from AYERS' OWN SITE!!!! >>> "Bill Ayers was born into privilege and is today a highly respected educator and community activist.(hmmmm . . . wonder what the difference is between a community organizer and a community activist?) For ten years, he lived on the run as a fugitive, stealing explosives, planting bombs, hiding from the law, and practicing "tradecraft" out of a John Le Carre novel. This portrait of a young pacifist who became a founder of one of the most militant political organizations in U.S. history is drawn with amazing candor and immediacy." These are words taken DIRECTLY from a link on AYERS' OWN WEB SITE. So don't take MY WORD for it, take BILL AYERS' WORD FOR IT!!!
So what is the question? "Senator Obama, would you care to tell America the TRUTH about your relationship with William Ayers, your knowledge of his life as a terrorist, where exactly your campaign kick-off for state senate took place, how you coincidentally found yourself serving as the Chairman of the Board for a foundation Ayers helped secure funding for, where the funding came from and where did the money REALLY go(can you say MONEY LAUNDERING?) and why ANYONE who loves this great country should vote for you?"
BONUS QUESTION: "Mr. Obama, why should America trust you to protect it from terrorism when in fact you have associated with an admitted and UNREPENTANT terrorist?"
My dear friends, you are judged by those you associate with. And William Ayers is only ONE of MANy who Obama has allied with to further his career, rising swiftly through the corrupt Chicago political scene to suddenly become the most inexperienced presidential candidate in this nation's HISTORY. Whether Obama sanctions Ayers' actions or not is not the point. The point is that we can't take the CHANCE! If Obama wanted to be leader of the greatest nation on earth, he shoul have done what EVERYONE ELSE DID and WORK his way up, and watch who he associates with. Doesn't ANYONE think it a little STRANGE that this man, who hails from CHICAGO, just "appeared" on the scene with no sxperience and is being touted by all the left wing liberal biased media as the next messiah? BASED ON WHAT!?!?!? Being a community organizer? Voting "absent" 130 times in the state senate? Serving TWO YEARS as a U.S. senator and not voting ONCE against his party? Check his record my friends. he is THE most liberal senator in the country.
COMING UP IN THE DAYS AHEAD:
SATURDAY-Why sitting in a pew for 20 years and hearing your pastor spew anti-american themes from the pulpit(and not WALKING OUT) disqualifies you from being anywhere near the White House.
SUNDAY- Why your wife not being proud of this country(until NOW of course) disqualifies you from being anywhere near the White House.
MONDAY- Why being a community organizer and a FRESHMAN senator who never voted across the aisle ONE TIME and who voted "present" in the state senate 130 times disqualifies you from being anywhere near the White House.
So what is the question? It is coming, but ask yourself, as an AMERICAN, not as a member of one part or the other, is THIS MAN a man you could even THINK about trusting as our commander in chief????
William Ayers co-founded the militant radical left organization Weatherman active during the 1960s and 1970s and was one of its top leaders. Did I mention that Barack Obama kicked off his run for state senate in Illinois in this man's back yard? But I digress. Among other things, in 1969, Ayers participated in planting a bomb at a statue dedicated to police casualties in the 1886 Haymarket Riot. The blast broke almost 100 windows and blew pieces of the statue onto the nearby Kennedy Expressway.
In 1970 Ayers "went underground" with several associates after the Greenwich Village townhouse explosion, in which Weatherman member Ted Gold, Ayers' close friend Terry Robbins, and Ayers girlfriend, Oughton, were killed when a nail bomb that was under construction exploded. Kathy Boudin and Cathy Wilkerson survived the blast. Ayers was not facing criminal charges at the time, but the federal government later filed charges against him.
"We weren't terrorists," Ayers told an interviewer for the Chicago Tribune in 2001. "The reason we weren't terrorists is because we did not commit random acts of terror against people. Terrorism was what was being practiced in the countryside of Vietnam by the United States." In a letter to the editor in the Chicago Tribune, Ayers wrote, "I condemn all forms of terrorism" — although Ayers has admitted bombing government buildings as part of his activities in the group.
So what's the connection to Obama? Obama, who has pretended to barely know the man who hosted his senatorial campaign kick-off barbecue in his BACK YARD, was hand picked by Ayers to sit as Chairman of the Board on a $70 Million trust established in part by Ayers. Are we to give Ayers the benefit of the doubt? That a man who still today brags about his radical acts of terrorism has sudden;y turned philanthropist? Please. If you truly LOVE your country, do a little research for YOURSELF . . . do a simple Google search, educate YOURSELF, and you will soon see that the left wing media has DUPED you once again, and cannot be trusted with the responsibility of keeping you informed. If you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.
NEWSFLASH: here is a link to Ayers' OWN WEB SITE where he is peddling his book: "FUGITIVE DAYS - A MEMOIR" http://www.beacon.org/productdetails.cfm?SKU=7124
This is a quote retrieved from AYERS' OWN SITE!!!! >>> "Bill Ayers was born into privilege and is today a highly respected educator and community activist.(hmmmm . . . wonder what the difference is between a community organizer and a community activist?) For ten years, he lived on the run as a fugitive, stealing explosives, planting bombs, hiding from the law, and practicing "tradecraft" out of a John Le Carre novel. This portrait of a young pacifist who became a founder of one of the most militant political organizations in U.S. history is drawn with amazing candor and immediacy." These are words taken DIRECTLY from a link on AYERS' OWN WEB SITE. So don't take MY WORD for it, take BILL AYERS' WORD FOR IT!!!
So what is the question? "Senator Obama, would you care to tell America the TRUTH about your relationship with William Ayers, your knowledge of his life as a terrorist, where exactly your campaign kick-off for state senate took place, how you coincidentally found yourself serving as the Chairman of the Board for a foundation Ayers helped secure funding for, where the funding came from and where did the money REALLY go(can you say MONEY LAUNDERING?) and why ANYONE who loves this great country should vote for you?"
BONUS QUESTION: "Mr. Obama, why should America trust you to protect it from terrorism when in fact you have associated with an admitted and UNREPENTANT terrorist?"
My dear friends, you are judged by those you associate with. And William Ayers is only ONE of MANy who Obama has allied with to further his career, rising swiftly through the corrupt Chicago political scene to suddenly become the most inexperienced presidential candidate in this nation's HISTORY. Whether Obama sanctions Ayers' actions or not is not the point. The point is that we can't take the CHANCE! If Obama wanted to be leader of the greatest nation on earth, he shoul have done what EVERYONE ELSE DID and WORK his way up, and watch who he associates with. Doesn't ANYONE think it a little STRANGE that this man, who hails from CHICAGO, just "appeared" on the scene with no sxperience and is being touted by all the left wing liberal biased media as the next messiah? BASED ON WHAT!?!?!? Being a community organizer? Voting "absent" 130 times in the state senate? Serving TWO YEARS as a U.S. senator and not voting ONCE against his party? Check his record my friends. he is THE most liberal senator in the country.
COMING UP IN THE DAYS AHEAD:
SATURDAY-Why sitting in a pew for 20 years and hearing your pastor spew anti-american themes from the pulpit(and not WALKING OUT) disqualifies you from being anywhere near the White House.
SUNDAY- Why your wife not being proud of this country(until NOW of course) disqualifies you from being anywhere near the White House.
MONDAY- Why being a community organizer and a FRESHMAN senator who never voted across the aisle ONE TIME and who voted "present" in the state senate 130 times disqualifies you from being anywhere near the White House.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Why read THIS blog?
Good question. Reason #1, and the reason I started this blog this evening. Sarah Palin, the Republican's VICE PRESENTIAL candidate has been raked over the coals in recent days by the biased liberal no-holds-barred media for 1)her 17 year old daughter being pregnant, and 2)her husband being arrested for D.U.I. charges 22 years ago!
So what's the big deal? I'll tell ya what the big deal is. The media wants to make a big deal about PRIVATE issues of non-candidates. What they SHOULD have told you LONG AGO, is that Barack Obama has associated with an unrepentant terrorist, William Ayers, who bombed the nation's capital and said he wished he had "done more," BEGAN his political career in Ayers' backyard, and was Chairman of the Board of an "organization" created by Ayers . . . but the media overlook ssuch important matters such as this to discuss the teenage pregnancy of the VP candidate's daughter!
Next, Palin's HUSBAND(not Pain herself), had a DUI 22 years ago. That's a misdemeanor. Barack Obama ADMITS to, around the same time, experimenting with "a little blow"(cocaine), which is a felony. Somehow Palin's HUSBAND'S misdemeanor DUI 22 years ago is supposed to be an issue, but Obama's FELONY use of hard drugs is just swept under the table?
This double standard cannot continue. Tell EVERYONE YOU KNOW to check this blog daily, for the GOOD OF THE COUNTRY, because you CAN'T TRUST THE MEDIA, and if you think you can, then I've got some lakefront property in New Orleans I would love to sell ya. After all, I have ZERO economic interest in you or ANYONE reading this blog.
See you guys tomorrow! God Bless America!!!
So what's the big deal? I'll tell ya what the big deal is. The media wants to make a big deal about PRIVATE issues of non-candidates. What they SHOULD have told you LONG AGO, is that Barack Obama has associated with an unrepentant terrorist, William Ayers, who bombed the nation's capital and said he wished he had "done more," BEGAN his political career in Ayers' backyard, and was Chairman of the Board of an "organization" created by Ayers . . . but the media overlook ssuch important matters such as this to discuss the teenage pregnancy of the VP candidate's daughter!
Next, Palin's HUSBAND(not Pain herself), had a DUI 22 years ago. That's a misdemeanor. Barack Obama ADMITS to, around the same time, experimenting with "a little blow"(cocaine), which is a felony. Somehow Palin's HUSBAND'S misdemeanor DUI 22 years ago is supposed to be an issue, but Obama's FELONY use of hard drugs is just swept under the table?
This double standard cannot continue. Tell EVERYONE YOU KNOW to check this blog daily, for the GOOD OF THE COUNTRY, because you CAN'T TRUST THE MEDIA, and if you think you can, then I've got some lakefront property in New Orleans I would love to sell ya. After all, I have ZERO economic interest in you or ANYONE reading this blog.
See you guys tomorrow! God Bless America!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
